QuoteIQ

Top 10 in 2026 · From the QuoteIQ Team

Top 10 Best Chemical Tracking Software for Landscaping Businesses in 2026

Landscapers who spray fertilizer, herbicide or insecticide need application records they can produce on request. We compared 10 tools on how well they log products, rates, weather and applicators, with pricing checked against vendor pages on October 7, 2026.

Quick Answer

The best chemical tracking software for landscaping businesses in 2026 is QuoteIQ. Its Chemical Tracking logs each application against the job: product and EPA registration number, rate and area, weather, and the applicator’s license, then exports a PDF record and a 40-column CSV. It sits alongside estimating, scheduling and invoicing, so one app covers the whole route. Per its feature page, Chemical Tracking is on the Pro plan ($199.99/mo) and above. Spraye and Service Autopilot suit lawn-treatment specialists, RealGreen, Arborgold and GorillaDesk are credible alternatives, and Aspire fits larger commercial landscape operations.

The Short Version

10 Best Chemical Tracking Tools for Landscapers at a Glance

RankPlatformStarting PriceBest ForStandout Feature
1QuoteIQFrom $29.99/mo · Chemical Tracking on Pro, $199.99/moLandscape and lawn crews that want records plus quoting and billingWind-over-label block, frozen license, PDF + 40-column CSV
2SprayeFrom $79.99/moLawn-treatment companiesAutomated chemical tracking with weather capture
3Service AutopilotFrom $49/mo · Chemical Tracking from Pro, $199/moEstablished lawn and landscape programsChemical Tracking plus route optimization and job costing
4RealGreenQuote-only (Capterra lists from $199/mo)Long-running lawn care operationsLawn-specific platform with chemical and pesticide usage tracking
5ArborgoldFrom $129/mo · Chemical Tracking from $299/moTree, lawn and landscape companiesChemical usage report from work-order data
6GorillaDeskFrom $49/mo ($539/yr)Budget-minded route businessesMaterials and EPA# lists with a Material Use report
7JobberFrom $29/mo billed annually ($49 month-to-month)Teams already on JobberChemical Treatment record with CSV export
8AspireCustom — contact salesCommercial landscape firmsTank-mix inventory and crew release by gallon
9LMNCustom — contact sales (Capterra lists Starter from $297/mo)Budget-based estimating and job costingEstimate-versus-actual job costing
10Housecall ProFrom $59/mo billed annually ($79 monthly)Simple recurring lawn schedulesRecurring schedules and online booking

Pricing verified from vendor pages on October 7, 2026, unless a row says otherwise. Vendor pricing changes often, so check each vendor’s site before you buy.

How We Picked the Top 10

We’re QuoteIQ. We made this list. We also picked our own platform as #1 — here’s exactly why, with the trade-offs each tool brings to the table. Every competitor claim below comes from that vendor’s own pricing page, help center or documentation, or from a software directory such as Capterra or GetApp where we say so, all read on October 7, 2026. We did not run hands-on tests of the competing products.

Why the details matter: the EPA says using a pesticide in a manner inconsistent with its labeling is a violation of federal law, so the rate, site and conditions you log should line up with the label. Federal law (7 U.S.C. 136i-1) requires certified applicators of restricted-use pesticides to keep records for two years, and states can ask for more. Minnesota, for example, requires commercial applicators to record nine items, including the EPA registration number, rate, temperature, wind speed and direction and the applicator’s license number, within five days of the application, and to keep the record for five years. The Bureau of Labor Statistics notes that most states require licensing for workers who apply pesticides, while rules for fertilizer vary by state. This page is general information, not legal advice. Check your state’s lead pesticide agency for the rules that apply to you.

Five criteria drove every ranking decision:

  1. Pricing transparency. Vendors that publish full pricing scored higher than vendors that require a sales call. Where a price could not be verified we wrote “Custom — contact sales.”
  2. Chemical-record depth for landscaping. Does the tool capture the product and EPA registration number, rate, treated area, weather, applicator license and a trustworthy timestamp for each application?
  3. Field usability. A record that has to be typed in at the office later is a weaker record. We looked for mobile logging and offline behavior.
  4. Exports and reporting. Can you filter by chemical, applicator or date range and hand an inspector a PDF or CSV, and does the vendor say anything about state report formats?
  5. Reviews and support. Capterra and GetApp listing ratings where we cite them, and QuoteIQ’s 4.7 rating across 4,103 App Store and Google Play reviews.

“You define what ‘done correctly’ looks like in writing, then you measure against it every time.”

— Justin Rogers, Co-Founder of QuoteIQ

That is the standard we held each tool to. A chemical record is the written definition of what was applied and under what conditions, and software earns its place only if it makes that record easy to create every single visit.

1

QuoteIQ — Best Overall Chemical Tracking for Landscaping

Essentials $29.99/mo · Beginner $99.99/mo · Pro $199.99/mo (Chemical Tracking) · Elite $299.99/mo · Max $699.99/mo · 14-day free trial

QuoteIQ is the platform we built so a landscaping or lawn care crew does not need one tool for quoting, another for scheduling and a spreadsheet for spray records. Its Chemical Tracking feature went live in September 2026 and keeps every application attached to the job, the customer and the invoice. It is off until you turn it on, so crews that do not spray never see it.

Here is what gets logged per application, according to the Chemical Tracking feature page: the product and its EPA registration number, the rate and unit from the label, the treated area and total amount, the application method, the target and site conditions, the applicator, and the product cost. Each record carries two timestamps. “Applied At” is the time of the treatment and can be edited, while “Logged At” is stamped by the system. The applicator’s license is copied onto the record when you save, so a later change to the license does not rewrite history.

Best for: Landscape and lawn crews of 1 to 20 people that spray some of their properties and want the record, the quote and the invoice in one app.

How QuoteIQ handles chemical tracking

Setup in plain steps: open Settings, then Catalog, then Chemical Tracking, and turn on Track Chemicals. QuoteIQ seeds 15 common products that show “Needs setup” until you add the rate from the product label, which is the right order of operations: the label sets the rate, and the software records it. Pair it with MapMeasure Pro (Beginner plan and above) to measure turf area from satellite imagery before you price or apply.

Pros

  • Per-job record with EPA number, rate, area, weather and applicator license in one place
  • Wind-over-label block with a recorded override path, not just a warning
  • Quoting, scheduling, recurring billing and invoices in the same app, so the record rides along with the job
  • 14-day trial on every plan; Pro includes 4 users

Cons

  • Per its feature page, Chemical Tracking is on Pro ($199.99/mo) and above, so the entry price is higher than Spraye Starter or GorillaDesk Basic
  • No agency-formatted state reports. You get a PDF and a 40-column CSV, and some states may ask for a specific form or extra fields
  • Records are frozen once saved, so check the rate before you hit save
  • Tank-mix batch inventory is not part of the Chemical Tracking feature page. If you reconcile tank mixes by batch, ask in a demo

“You don’t argue. You listen, then you show your documentation.”

— Mike Vidan, Co-Founder of QuoteIQ

That is the moment a chemical record pays for itself: a customer questions a treatment, and you open the job and show the product, rate, weather and applicator.

Ask in the demo: which fields your state asks for beyond the standard record, how you want corrections handled, and how a day of spraying looks on the technician’s phone with no signal.

Verdict: If your crews both maintain properties and apply products, QuoteIQ gives you a defensible application record without a second system. It is not the cheapest way to log chemicals, and no software can promise you are compliant, but it connects the record to the quote, the schedule and the invoice. Plans run Essentials $29.99, Beginner $99.99, Pro $199.99, Elite $299.99 and Max $699.99 per month, with two months free on annual billing.

Watch What Is QuoteIQ? →

Start QuoteIQ Free Trial See QuoteIQ Pricing

Landscaping crews can also see how QuoteIQ is set up for the trade on the landscaping management software page.

2

Spraye — Best Purpose-Built Lawn Treatment CRM

Starter $79.99/mo · Essentials $169.99/mo · Premium about $400/mo · Elite $999.99/mo

Spraye is a CRM built specifically for lawn treatment companies, and its pages are aimed squarely at “lawn treatment pros.” Chemical tracking is one of its headline features rather than an add-on to a general scheduler. Its feature page says it will “automatically log chemicals used, rates, weather data, times and conditions” and “generate compliance reports in seconds,” with customizable regulatory compliance settings.

Pricing is tiered by users and active properties. Starter is $79.99/mo ($959.88 a year) for 1 user and 100 active properties. Essentials is $169.99/mo ($1,895.88 a year) for 2 users and 1,000 properties. Premium is just under $400/mo ($4,223.88 a year) for 4 users and 5,000 properties, and Elite is $999.99/mo ($10,559.88 a year) for 8 users and 10,000 properties. Extra users cost $39.99 to $59.99 a month depending on the tier.

For a landscaping company that treats only part of its book, the tier caps matter. Spraye’s plans cap active properties at 100, 1,000, 5,000 or 10,000, so ask how active properties are counted before you decide whether your mowing and maintenance customers count against the limit as well as your treatment customers.

Best for: Companies whose recurring revenue is mostly fertilization, weed control and other treatment rounds.

How Spraye handles chemical tracking

Pros

  • Purpose-built for lawn treatment, so the chemical workflow is central rather than bolted on
  • Weather data is captured automatically instead of typed in
  • Truck loading sheet and route summary help with daily prep
  • Starter tier is cheaper than QuoteIQ Pro for a one-person spray operation

Cons

  • Pricing scales with active properties, so cost climbs as your route grows
  • Public pages do not spell out EPA-number fields, applicator-license handling, state report formats or offline behavior
  • Narrower fit if much of your work is installation, design or non-chemical maintenance
  • Additional users cost $39.99 to $59.99 a month

Ask in the demo: whether a record stores the EPA registration number and the applicator license, which state report formats it can produce, what happens with no signal, and how property counts are measured against your tier.

Verdict: If treatment programs are the core of your business, Spraye is the specialist to put in front of QuoteIQ in a demo. If you mix mowing, installs and some spraying, a broader tool fits better.

Visit Spraye

3

Service Autopilot — Best for Established Lawn and Landscape Programs

Startup $49/mo · Pro $199/mo · Pro Plus $499/mo · Elite custom (annual rates plus a sign-up fee)

Service Autopilot is a long-standing platform for lawn care and landscape companies. Its pricing page lists four tiers (Startup, Pro, Pro Plus and Elite) at annual-subscription rates plus a sign-up fee, and the plan chart shows “Chemical Tracking” included in Pro and above but not in Startup. Pro adds estimating, employee tracking, asset tracking, job costing and route optimization, according to GetApp’s plan summary.

The vendor’s home page emphasizes scheduling, invoicing, route optimization, GPS tracking, expense tracking and property details. It does not describe the chemical record itself, so you will have to see the screens to learn which fields it captures.

For a landscape crew, the practical value is having chemical records, routes and job costing on the same Pro plan. The trade-off is setup. Plan time for services, routes and product lists, ideally in the off-season rather than the first week of spring, and ask the vendor what the sign-up fee covers.

Best for: Established lawn and landscape companies with office staff who want chemical tracking next to routing and job costing.

How Service Autopilot handles chemical tracking

Pros

  • Chemical Tracking is on the plan most growing companies buy anyway
  • Strong routing and job-costing tools for route-based businesses
  • Established product aimed at lawn and landscape companies
  • Published price points for three of four tiers

Cons

  • Chemical Tracking is not included in Startup
  • A sign-up fee applies to every plan, and the amount is not published
  • Public pages do not list record fields, state report formats or offline behavior
  • GetApp’s summary notes mobile-user allowances on higher tiers, so confirm seat counts for your crew

Ask in the demo: the exact fields in the chemical record, what the sign-up fee is, how many mobile users are included at your tier, and whether state reports are standard or custom.

Verdict: A solid pick if you already run a route business and want chemical tracking inside a mature scheduling system. Expect a longer setup than QuoteIQ and budget for the sign-up fee.

Visit Service Autopilot

4

RealGreen — Best for Long-Running Lawn Care Operations

Quote-only · Capterra lists from $199/mo flat

RealGreen, part of WorkWave, has served lawn care and landscape businesses for decades. Its public pages focus on scheduling and routing, a technician mobile app, CRM, invoicing, digital forms, a customer portal, marketing automation and estimating. The lawn care page says technicians can “input product usage, weather and condition codes” in the mobile app.

Capterra lists RealGreen at a starting price of $199 a month on a flat rate, with “Chemical Usage Tracking” (schedule, track and record applications of chemicals) and “Pesticide Usage Tracking” among 92 features. The vendor does not publish pricing, so treat the Capterra number as a directory listing. Capterra shows a 3.9 out of 5 rating from 149 reviews, with reviewers repeatedly mentioning crashes, outages and performance problems.

For a landscape crew that treats part of its book, a lawn-specific design can be an advantage or a constraint. If much of your revenue is installation and maintenance, ask how the platform handles estimating for design-build work, because the pages we read emphasize lawn care programs.

Best for: Established lawn care companies that want a lawn-specific system and are willing to go through a sales process.

How RealGreen handles chemical tracking

Pros

  • Lawn-specific heritage and a long track record
  • Mobile app records product usage, weather and conditions in the field
  • Digital forms for extra documentation your state may ask for
  • Broad suite that includes routing, invoicing and a customer portal

Cons

  • Pricing is not published
  • Capterra reviewers report crashes and outages that can hit field work
  • Vendor pages do not detail chemical inventory, application logs or state reporting
  • 3.9 out of 5 on Capterra is the lowest rating among the tools where we cite one

Ask in the demo: uptime and support history over the last year, which state report formats are built in, how chemical inventory ties to applications, and current pricing for your property count.

Verdict: Worth a demo if you want a lawn-specialized platform and can verify the reliability concerns for yourself. The public detail on the chemical record is thinner than we would like.

Visit RealGreen

5

Arborgold — Best for Tree, Lawn and Landscape Companies

Starter $129/mo · Professional $299/mo · Enterprise $499/mo · flat-rate, not per user

Arborgold describes itself as software for “tree, lawn and landscape companies of all sizes,” which makes it a natural fit when your crews spray as part of a wider scope. GetApp lists three flat-rate tiers (Starter $129/mo, Professional $299/mo and Enterprise $499/mo) and shows “Chemical Tracking and Reporting” in the Professional and Enterprise plans only. GetApp gives Arborgold a 4.3 out of 5 rating from 65 reviews.

Arborgold’s own blog explains the approach: record chemical type, quantity, pricing and cost on work orders and invoices, then “create a simple report with all data pertaining to chemical inventory and usage.” It also notes that regulations vary from state to state, a headache for companies working in several jurisdictions.

For landscapers who also prune, feed trees or treat ornamentals, a tool that understands tree and shrub work can fit better than a pure lawn tool. Ask to see how a mixed work order, such as a mow, a shrub spray and a fertilizer application, appears in the chemical report, since that is the shape of many landscaping jobs.

Best for: Companies that mix tree care, lawn treatment and landscape work and prefer flat-rate pricing.

How Arborgold handles chemical tracking

Pros

  • Chemical reporting in a tool aimed at tree, lawn and landscape work
  • Flat-rate pricing makes crew growth less expensive than per-user models
  • Chemical usage report built from work-order data
  • Free trial available, according to GetApp

Cons

  • Chemical tracking is not included in Starter
  • One reviewer on GetApp said the vendor quoted $150 per hour to develop a state compliance report, even though the website mentions state chemical compliance. That is one reviewer’s account, so verify in writing
  • Only 65 reviews on GetApp, so the sample is small
  • Public pages do not show the field-level record or offline behavior

Ask in the demo: whether your state’s report is built in or custom work, what that work would cost, and which fields (EPA number, applicator license, weather) are captured per application.

Verdict: A reasonable choice when tree and lawn work share crews, as long as you confirm your state report is standard and not billable custom development.

Visit Arborgold

6

GorillaDesk — Best Budget Pick for Simple Material Records

Basic $49/mo ($539/yr) · Pro $99/mo ($1,089/yr) · Growth $149/mo ($1,639/yr)

GorillaDesk serves pest control and lawn care companies that want an affordable route-based tool. Its pricing page lists Material Tracking and Reporting on the Basic plan, described as a way to “easily keep accurate chemical use records.” Pricing is based on the number of routes, with unlimited admin users and mobile devices; only users assigned to schedules need paid seats.

GorillaDesk’s help center describes the Material Usage add-on in more detail. It keeps seven customizable master lists (Materials and EPA#, Locations, Target Pests, Methods of Treatment, Units, Area and Dilution), lets technicians add materials from service templates, the job’s Materials tab or a device, and reports through Reports, then Material Use, with summaries or detailed lists by date range. Materials can be shown on invoices and work orders.

Because pricing is based on routes, a landscaping company with several crews should count schedules, not employees, when comparing plans. A three-crew company may end up on Pro or Growth rather than Basic, so price your actual route count before treating $49 as your number.

Best for: Budget-minded lawn and pest route businesses that want EPA numbers and treatment methods on every job.

How GorillaDesk handles chemical tracking

Pros

  • Lowest entry price among the tools with a documented chemical record
  • Unlimited admin users and mobile devices
  • Master lists keep EPA numbers and methods consistent
  • Free data migration is advertised

Cons

  • The pricing page puts Material Tracking in Basic, but the help center calls Material Usage an add-on. Confirm what is included in your quote
  • Basic routing is limited to 25 stops
  • Pest-control roots, so confirm it fits landscape-specific workflows such as install estimates
  • No public detail on state report formats

Ask in the demo: whether Material Usage costs extra, how technicians log it offline, how many route stops your plan allows, and how applicator licenses are recorded.

Verdict: The cheapest credible way to keep EPA-numbered chemical records on every job. Verify the add-on question before you commit.

Visit GorillaDesk

7

Jobber — Best Familiar Tool With a Chemical Treatment Record

Core $29/mo billed annually ($39 with a one-year commitment, $49 month-to-month) · Connect from $99/mo annual · Grow from $149/mo annual · Plus from $399/mo annual

Jobber is one of the most widely used field service apps for lawn and landscaping crews. It offers a chemical tracking feature that its feature page says captures “the chemicals and pesticides you use on the job along with their registration number and the pests you used them for,” plus property address, weather conditions and applicator information. Users can download the company’s entire chemical application history and sort it by date, client or applicator.

The help center fills in the workflow: from a client profile you choose New, then Chemical Treatment, and enter the service address, job, applicator, date and time, chemical name and concentration, application details, weather and custom fields. It says records can help meet jurisdictions that require records of up to seven years, and that downloads come as CSV. It also says chemical tracking is available on select plans, and that “there is no chemical tracking in the mobile app. Chemicals must be recorded from jobber.com,” which matters a great deal for a crew in a truck. Check that statement against the current app before you decide. Jobber’s per-user price is $29/mo for each additional user.

If chemicals must be recorded from jobber.com, as the help center states, the cost of adding records there is mostly process. Someone has to enter treatments from a browser, which works for office-managed programs and less well for a spray tech who needs the record created on the property at the time of application.

Best for: Landscape crews already on Jobber who need a record and are fine logging it from a browser.

How Jobber handles chemical tracking

Pros

  • Familiar interface that many crews already know
  • Established app with a large user base
  • Record includes registration number, target and weather
  • Clear public pricing with annual discounts

Cons

  • Per the help center, recording happens on the web, not in the mobile app
  • Plan eligibility is described only as “select plans”
  • State-specific report exports are not mentioned
  • Extra users cost $29/mo each, so cost grows with crew size

Ask in the demo: which plan includes chemical tracking, whether mobile logging has shipped, and how a state report would be produced from the CSV.

Verdict: A reasonable fit if you are already invested in Jobber and need a record without changing systems. For crews that log from the property, a mobile-first tool will be easier.

Compare QuoteIQ vs Jobber

8

Aspire — Best for Commercial Landscape Operations

Custom — contact sales

Aspire is business-management software for commercial landscape companies. Capterra lists it with a 4.4 out of 5 rating from 362 reviews and positions it for landscape companies with more than $1 million in revenue. Pricing is quote-based across Growth, Corporate and Enterprise tiers.

Aspire’s documentation covers chemical tank mixtures. It lets you track individual chemical items, tank mixture formulas, inventory levels and material costs, and crews can release by gallons of tank mix used on each property through the Crew Mobile app. Three methods are described: crews calculate individual items in the field, bulk adjustment of mixes at month-end, or individual mix adjustment per batch. The documentation focuses on inventory and cost and does not address EPA registration numbers, applicator certifications or compliance reporting. A community thread advises recording the EPA name and registration number for every product in the catalog from the start.

Aspire’s strength for chemicals is cost control, which suits companies where fertilizer and chemical spend is a meaningful share of job cost. For a smaller landscaping business that mainly needs an application record, the effort of setting up tank-mix formulas and inventory may be more than the job requires.

Best for: Commercial landscape firms that care about tank-mix inventory, job costing and estimate-versus-actual reporting.

How Aspire handles chemical tracking

Pros

  • Strong on inventory and cost control for chemicals
  • Built for larger commercial landscape workflows
  • Mobile release of mix quantities by crews
  • Good fit when job costing drives your margins

Cons

  • Pricing is not published
  • Documentation focuses on inventory and cost, not compliance fields
  • EPA numbers and licenses depend on how you set up the product catalog
  • Positioned for companies above $1 million in revenue, so smaller crews may find it more than they need

Ask in the demo: how EPA numbers and applicator licenses appear on the application record, what a state report looks like, and what it costs at your size.

Verdict: A strong choice for commercial landscape companies that treat chemicals as inventory and cost. For compliance-style records, confirm the fields in a demo. See our QuoteIQ vs Aspire comparison for the wider picture.

Compare QuoteIQ vs Aspire

9

LMN — Best for Budget-Based Estimating (Not a Chemical Log)

Custom — contact sales · Capterra lists Starter from $297/mo plus an $847 implementation fee

LMN is a landscape-specific platform known for budget-based estimating and job costing. Its page describes estimates built from your budget, including labor, materials, equipment and overhead; job costing that shows estimate versus actuals while the job is live; automated drag-and-drop scheduling; and a mobile app for crew time and production in English and Spanish. LMN does not publish plan prices. Capterra lists Starter from $297 a month, and third-party listings put the Professional tier anywhere from about $598 to $648 a month, so confirm current numbers with LMN.

Capterra rates LMN 4.5 out of 5 from 90 reviews. We could not find chemical or pesticide application tracking in its 50 documented Capterra features or on LMN’s public landscape page. That does not prove the capability is absent, but it means you should plan on a separate record for spraying unless a demo shows otherwise.

You can run LMN for estimating and job costing and keep spray records in a separate tool. The downside is double entry: property, customer and service details live in two places, which is why we rank tools that combine both capabilities higher on a list about chemical tracking.

Best for: Landscape contractors whose biggest problem is accurate bids and job costing, not application records.

How LMN handles chemical tracking

Pros

  • Landscape-specific estimating and costing
  • Landscape-specific workflows and terminology
  • Bilingual crew app
  • Rated 4.5 out of 5 on Capterra

Cons

  • No public evidence of a chemical application record
  • Pricing is quote-based, with an implementation fee listed on Capterra
  • Third-party pricing for higher tiers is inconsistent
  • Sprayed properties would need a second system

Ask in the demo: whether application records are on the roadmap, how you would document sprays today, and the implementation fee.

Verdict: Choose LMN for estimating and costing, and pair it with a separate chemical record. If you want one system for both, see our QuoteIQ vs LMN comparison.

Compare QuoteIQ vs LMN

10

Housecall Pro — Best for Simple Recurring Lawn Schedules

Basic $59/mo billed annually ($79 monthly) · Essentials $149/mo annual ($189 monthly) · Max $299/mo annual ($329 monthly)

Housecall Pro is a general home-service app that markets to lawn care. Its lawn care page highlights recurring schedules for weekly, bi-weekly and seasonal visits, route optimization, “On my way” texts with GPS, automatic invoicing, and online booking. It lists weekly mowing, fertilization, cleanups and seasonal treatments among the recurring services it can manage.

The lawn care page makes no mention of chemical tracking, pesticide management or compliance records. If you choose it, plan to approximate a log with notes, photos and any checklists you configure, and to keep EPA numbers, rates and weather somewhere else. Basic includes 1 user, Essentials includes 5, and Max includes 8 with extra users at $35 a month.

If most of your work is mowing and cleanups with a few seasonal applications, Housecall Pro’s simplicity can be enough, provided you keep EPA numbers, rates and weather in a log you can reproduce quickly. If sprays are a growing share of revenue, a structured record becomes the safer choice.

Best for: Crews that mostly mow and maintain, apply products only occasionally, and want clean recurring scheduling.

How Housecall Pro handles chemical tracking

Pros

  • Simple recurring-visit scheduling
  • Online booking for new lawn customers
  • Published pricing with annual discounts
  • Includes 5 users on Essentials

Cons

  • No structured chemical record, so no EPA-number or rate fields
  • Per-user pricing beyond included seats ($35/mo on Max)
  • A separate log is needed for sprays
  • Plan tiers gate features, so verify which tier you need

Ask in the demo: whether any structured chemical form exists today, how you would store EPA numbers and rates, and which tier unlocks the recurring and routing features you need.

Verdict: A fine scheduler for non-chemical lawn work. If you apply products, it leaves the record to you. See our QuoteIQ vs Housecall Pro comparison.

Compare QuoteIQ vs Housecall Pro

Landscaping and Chemical Records by the Numbers (2025–2026)

$188.8BLandscape services industry market size in 2025 (NALP, citing IBISWorld)
692,777Landscaping service businesses (NALP)
1,299,200Grounds maintenance worker jobs in 2025 (BLS)
5%Projected employment growth, 2025–35, faster than average (BLS)
2 yearsFederal minimum for restricted-use pesticide records (7 U.S.C. 136i-1)
5 yearsMinnesota retention period for applicator records (Minn. Stat. 18B.37)

The scale matters because a large number of businesses, each with its own crews and routes, are handling products that carry labeled rates and recordkeeping rules. The BLS adds that workers who apply pesticides generally need a license in their state, while fertilizer rules vary. Whatever your state requires, the practical test is the same: can you pull up the product, rate, date, weather and applicator for any treated property within a minute?

Which Chemical Tracking Software Should You Pick? 7 Situations, 7 Picks

If you’re a solo operator who sprays a handful of properties

If the record is the only thing you need, GorillaDesk Basic ($49/mo) or Spraye Starter ($79.99/mo) cost less. If you also want quoting, scheduling, recurring billing and invoices in one app, pick QuoteIQ. Essentials ($29.99/mo) covers the business basics, but per its feature page Chemical Tracking is on Pro ($199.99/mo), which includes 4 users. Try the 14-day trial on real jobs first.

If you have 2-3 employees

QuoteIQ Pro ($199.99/mo, 4 users) is the sweet spot. It adds Chemical Tracking, assigning team members to jobs, job costing and QuickBooks Online. Each record carries the applicator’s license snapshot, so a second tech’s applications show their own license.

If you have 5-10 employees

QuoteIQ Elite ($299.99/mo, 10 users) adds Route Optimization, review automation, Inventory and Time Tracker Pro on top of the Pro feature set. For a mixed crew that mows in the morning and sprays in the afternoon, having routes, time and records in one place is the point. Service Autopilot Pro is the closest alternative for route-based programs.

If you have 10-20 employees and are scaling fast

QuoteIQ Max ($699.99/mo, 20 users) adds crews and unlimited pipelines, with a published price. Ask Service Autopilot and RealGreen for demos of their higher tiers and compare a sample chemical record from each, along with total cost including sign-up fees and extra users.

If you have 20+ employees or run a commercial landscape operation

Aspire is built for larger commercial landscape firms, with tank-mix inventory and cost control. RealGreen is the lawn-specialized option at scale. Both are quote-only, so budget a sales cycle and ask to see a real application record and a state report before you sign.

If you run fertilization and weed-control programs as your main business

Spraye and Service Autopilot are built around treatment rounds, and both belong on your shortlist. If estimating, recurring billing and a customer-facing invoice that shows products and EPA numbers matter as much as the log, add QuoteIQ to the demo list.

If you’re tech-resistant and want minimal training

Choose the tool where the record lives on the job screen instead of in a separate module. QuoteIQ’s Chem tab sits on the job, with products seeded and per-service switches. GorillaDesk’s master lists are also straightforward once set up. Either way, plan an hour to enter your products and label rates before the first spray day.

How We Picked the Top 10 (Methodology Detail)

  1. Listed the tools landscapers actually use for application records. We started from searches for chemical application tracking in landscaping, then added the platforms landscapers commonly run. We dropped SingleOps because its pages target tree care, and kept LMN and Housecall Pro as context because many landscape crews already use them.

  2. Verified pricing against each vendor’s published source on October 7, 2026. Where a vendor does not publish prices, we wrote “Custom — contact sales” and noted any directory figures separately, with their source. We did not repeat trial terms from competitors.

  3. Read the chemical-tracking documentation for each tool. We looked for the product and EPA number, rate, treated area, weather, applicator license, timestamps, mobile and offline logging, and exports. Where a vendor’s pages are silent on a field, we say so and put it in the demo questions.

  4. Cross-checked ratings and user complaints. We quoted Capterra and GetApp listing ratings where they exist and flagged single-reviewer claims as such. QuoteIQ’s 4.7 rating across 4,103 reviews comes from the App Store and Google Play.

  5. Embedded operator perspective from Mike Vidan and Justin Rogers. Both Co-Founders have run service businesses and built QuoteIQ around the documentation habits that protect a contractor when a customer disputes the work.

What Landscaping and Lawn Care Pros Say About QuoteIQ

★★★★★

“This app simplifies client management, scheduling, and invoicing, making pressure washing and landscaping businesses run smoothly.”

— Danelle Nenita, App Store

★★★★★

“QuoteIQ makes scheduling jobs effortless for my lawn care business, saving time and reducing errors.”

— Sirena_Streeterr, App Store

★★★★★

“Have used it both for pressure washing and lawn care jobs!”

— Collin Thorup, Google Play

These are 5-star reviews from lawn care and landscaping users about QuoteIQ in general. None mention Chemical Tracking, which launched in September 2026, so read them as feedback on everyday scheduling, client management and invoicing.

Built by Operators Who’ve Run Service Businesses

Mike Vidan, Co-Founder

Mike is a 20+ year service business owner and a Co-Founder of QuoteIQ. He is the creator of the Mike Vidan YouTube channel, which has 580,000+ subscribers and covers pricing, quoting and running a contractor business.

Read Mike’s insights →

Justin Rogers, Co-Founder

Justin is a serial entrepreneur and home service business owner, and a Co-Founder of QuoteIQ. He is the creator of the ForeverSelfEmployed YouTube channel and writes about documented processes, pricing and building a business that runs without the owner.

Read Justin’s insights →

Frequently Asked Questions

QuoteIQ is the best chemical tracking software for most landscaping businesses in 2026. Its per-job record captures the product and EPA number, rate, area, weather and applicator license, blocks a save when wind is over the label maximum, and exports PDF and 40-column CSV files. Spraye and Service Autopilot suit lawn-treatment specialists, and Aspire fits larger commercial operations. Per its feature page, Chemical Tracking is on QuoteIQ’s Pro plan ($199.99/mo) and above.

Verified prices run from $49/mo (GorillaDesk Basic) and $79.99/mo (Spraye Starter) to $199/mo for Service Autopilot Pro and $199.99/mo for QuoteIQ Pro, where Chemical Tracking starts. Arborgold’s chemical reporting starts at $299/mo. RealGreen, Aspire and LMN do not publish prices. Many plans add charges for users or sign-up fees, so price your whole crew before you compare.

We could not verify a permanent free plan with a documented chemical record among these ten tools. QuoteIQ offers a 14-day free trial on every plan, so you can test the workflow on real jobs. Paper logs and spreadsheets cost nothing, but they are slow to search, easy to lose and hard to produce quickly when a customer or inspector asks.

If the record is your only need, GorillaDesk Basic ($49/mo) or Spraye Starter ($79.99/mo) cost less than QuoteIQ Pro. If you also want estimates, scheduling, recurring billing and invoices in one app, QuoteIQ Pro ($199.99/mo, 4 users) is the better value. QuoteIQ Essentials ($29.99/mo) works for solo mowing and maintenance, but Chemical Tracking is on Pro.

QuoteIQ Pro ($199.99/mo, 4 users) covers most 2 to 5 person crews with Chemical Tracking, team assignment, job costing and QuickBooks Online. GorillaDesk and Spraye are cheaper if you only need the record. Service Autopilot Pro ($199/mo plus a sign-up fee) adds route optimization and job costing for route-based programs.

Aspire is built for larger commercial landscape firms and handles tank-mix inventory and cost, with custom pricing. RealGreen and the higher tiers of Service Autopilot are lawn-focused options. QuoteIQ Max ($699.99/mo, 20 users, crews, unlimited pipelines) has a published price. Ask each vendor to show a sample chemical record before you sign.

QuoteIQ has iOS and Android apps with a 4.7 aggregate rating across 4,103 App Store and Google Play reviews, and Chemical Tracking entries save to an offline queue. Jobber’s help center says chemical tracking is not in its mobile app and must be recorded from jobber.com. Ask any vendor how logging behaves with no signal.

QuoteIQ’s InstaSchedule (Elite, $299.99/mo) lets customers self-book from your calendar, and InstaQuote lets them request a quote online. Housecall Pro’s lawn care page says customers can book through Google or your website. Neither booking tool is a chemical record, so check how appointments connect to your application logs.

LMN is known for budget-based estimating that builds bids from labor, materials, equipment and overhead, but it shows no public chemical log. QuoteIQ includes estimates with options and packages, e-signatures on every plan, and MapMeasure Pro for satellite turf measurement on Beginner and above. Pair estimating with a record system you trust.

QuoteIQ handles recurring jobs and recurring invoice subscriptions on every plan. Spraye adds a route summary and truck loading sheet, Service Autopilot lists route optimization on Pro, and Housecall Pro supports weekly, bi-weekly and seasonal schedules. Test your real round structure, such as a multi-round fertilization program, in a trial or demo.

QuoteIQ’s invoice shows products, EPA numbers and the longest re-entry interval, and never shows your cost. Spraye says it can include chemical and weather information in invoicing automatically, and GorillaDesk can print materials on invoices and work orders. QuoteIQ also takes online payments on every plan.

QuoteIQ includes Route Optimization on Elite ($299.99/mo) and above. Service Autopilot lists it on Pro ($199/mo), Housecall Pro offers route mapping and “On my way” texts, and RealGreen markets dynamic routing. GorillaDesk Basic limits routing to 25 stops, which matters for larger routes.

Download your chemical application history from Jobber as a CSV before you cancel, and store it with your other business records for the retention period your state requires. Minnesota, for example, requires five years. Then import your customer list into the new tool and ask the vendor how to archive historical records. Running both for a week reduces risk.

Housecall Pro’s lawn care page does not mention chemical tracking. QuoteIQ is the best alternative for most crews because Pro ($199.99/mo) adds a structured chemical record to the quoting, scheduling and invoicing you already use. GorillaDesk and Spraye are lower-cost options if you only need the log.

Aspire does not publish prices, so the gap cannot be priced. Service Autopilot’s Pro tier, where Chemical Tracking begins, is $199/mo on an annual rate plus a sign-up fee. QuoteIQ Pro is $199.99/mo and GorillaDesk Basic is $49/mo. Compare total cost, including sign-up fees, extra users and add-ons, not just the list price.

Federal law requires certified applicators of restricted-use pesticides to keep records for two years, and states set the rest. Minnesota, for example, requires the date, completion time, brand, EPA registration number, rate, units treated, weather, site, customer and applicator details within five days, kept five years. Check your state lead agency. Software helps you keep records but cannot guarantee compliance.

Trusted by 40,000+ verified contractors · 4.7★ average rating · 4,103+ reviews on App Store + Google Play

Related Reading

The Bottom Line

For most landscaping businesses that apply products, QuoteIQ is the best chemical tracking choice in 2026. The record captures what an inspector or an unhappy customer will ask about, the wind check stops an out-of-label application before it is saved, and the data lives next to the estimate, schedule and invoice instead of in a separate system. The trade-offs are real: Chemical Tracking is on Pro ($199.99/mo) and above, there are no agency-formatted state reports, and no software can promise you are compliant.

Spraye and Service Autopilot are the strongest specialists if treatment programs are your business. GorillaDesk is the budget route to EPA-numbered records, as long as you confirm the add-on question. RealGreen and Arborgold deserve demos if you want lawn-specific or tree-and-lawn tools, and Aspire is the pick for commercial operations that manage chemicals as inventory. Jobber works if you are already on it and can live with web-only logging, while LMN and Housecall Pro are good business tools that leave the spray record to you.

Landscaping is a small-crew industry with a lot of regulation attached to a few visits. As states keep tightening recordkeeping and customers expect proof of what was applied to their lawn, the winning habit is simple: log it on the property, log it once, and be able to show it in a minute. The 14-day QuoteIQ trial is the easiest way to test that habit on real jobs.

Built for Landscaping Businesses Ready to Keep Better Records

14-day free trial on every plan. Plans start at $29.99/mo.

Start Free TrialSchedule a Demo

Sources Cited

  1. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Grounds Maintenance Workers — Occupational Outlook Handbook. bls.gov. Accessed October 2026.
  2. National Association of Landscape Professionals. Landscape Industry Statistics. landscapeprofessionals.org. Accessed October 2026.
  3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Introduction to Pesticide Labels. epa.gov.
  4. Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute. 7 U.S.C. § 136i-1, Pesticide recordkeeping. law.cornell.edu.
  5. Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes. Minnesota Statutes 18B.37, Commercial and noncommercial applicator records. revisor.mn.gov.
  6. QuoteIQ. Chemical Tracking feature page. myquoteiq.com.
  7. Vendor pricing, documentation and directory pages, all accessed October 7, 2026: Spraye pricing · Spraye chemical tracking · Service Autopilot pricing · GetApp: Service Autopilot · Capterra: RealGreen · RealGreen · GetApp: Arborgold pricing · Arborgold chemical reporting · GorillaDesk pricing · GorillaDesk Material Usage · Jobber pricing · Jobber chemical tracking · Jobber help center · Aspire tank mixtures · Capterra: Aspire · Capterra: LMN · Housecall Pro pricing · Housecall Pro lawn care.