A pesticide application record is the paperwork that protects your license, and pest control software handles it very differently from tool to tool. We compared 10 platforms on what a record captures, what each one costs, and how it holds up on a real route day.
The best pesticide record keeping software for pest control businesses in 2026 is QuoteIQ, for owners who want application records inside the same app they use to quote, schedule and invoice. Its Chemical Tracking logs the product and EPA registration number, rate, treated area, weather and the applicator’s license on each job, with a system-stamped time nobody can edit. PestPac and FieldRoutes are stronger when you need built-in state report exports or run large multi-branch operations, and GorillaDesk is a solid pest-specific option with published prices. Always confirm your state’s required fields with its lead agency.
| Rank | Platform | Starting Price | Best For | Standout Feature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | QuoteIQ | From $29.99/mo. Chemical Tracking on Pro ($199.99/mo) and up | Owner-operators to roughly 20-user pest businesses that want records inside the job | Chem tab with EPA number, rate, wind check and license snapshot |
| #2 | PestPac | Custom: contact sales | Larger and multi-branch pest operations | Built-in California, Cal-Ag and Arizona TARF exports |
| #3 | FieldRoutes | Custom: request pricing | Route-based recurring pest programs | Chemical usage in the tech app plus state chemical reports |
| #4 | GorillaDesk | $49/mo Basic ($539/yr) | Small and mid-size pest companies | Materials and EPA# lists shown on invoices and work orders |
| #5 | Briostack | Not published; Capterra lists about $50/mo | Pest and lawn operators | “Track and report on chemical usage” |
| #6 | Jobber | $29/mo Core (annual), $49 monthly | Generalists that want a native chemical form | Chemical tracking form with history by date, client or applicator |
| #7 | Service Autopilot | $49/mo Startup (annual) | Lawn-plus-pest operators | Chemical Tracking listed in its plan comparison |
| #8 | Housecall Pro | $59/mo Basic (annual), $79 monthly | Teams that will keep records in checklists | Custom checklists and photo reports |
| #9 | Workiz | Custom: request pricing | Call-heavy generalist teams | Custom fields, checklists and service plans |
| #10 | ServiceM8 | Free, then $29/mo | Owner-operators who need simple forms | PDF treatment reports and asset history for traps |
Prices checked on vendor pages on October 7, 2026. The Briostack figure comes from a third-party listing, so confirm it with the vendor. Prices change often, so verify before you buy.
We’re QuoteIQ. We made this list. We also picked our own platform as #1 — here’s exactly why, with the trade-offs each tool brings to the table. Five criteria drove every ranking decision:
What a complete record looks like to us. We looked for nine fields on every platform: product name, EPA registration number, amount applied or rate, target pest, date and time, site and customer, applicator name, applicator license number, and treatment method or area. Where a state also asks for conditions such as wind, temperature or fumigation exposure time, we noted whether the tool carries them. A tool that captures the fields as structured entries scored higher than one where the same information lives in a free-text note, because structured entries can be searched, filtered and exported.
Our sources were each vendor’s own pricing and feature pages (checked October 7, 2026), Capterra listings for ratings and for prices vendors do not publish, and public data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the National Pest Management Association and state rules. We did not hands-on test the competitors, so every competitor claim below comes from what the vendor publishes. If a vendor page did not say something, we say we could not confirm it.
One more thing on QuoteIQ at #1: we rank on the combination of record depth, published pricing and fit for a typical small-to-mid pest business, not on who has the most state-specific exports or warehouse inventory. PestPac and FieldRoutes are stronger there, and we say so in their entries. This page is general information, not legal advice. Pesticide record rules differ by state, so check your state’s lead agency.
“You define what ‘done correctly’ looks like in writing, then you measure against it every time.”
— Justin Rogers, Co-Founder of QuoteIQ
That is how we scored: we wrote down what a complete pesticide record contains before we looked at a single feature list.
QuoteIQ is our platform, so read this entry with that in mind. Chemical Tracking puts a Chem tab on the job your crew already opened. The technician picks a product from your prepared catalog, and the record carries its EPA registration number, the rate read off the label, the area actually treated and the total amount applied, calculated from rate times area. Method and target pest come from pick-lists your company controls instead of free text, so the data stays searchable.
Conditions and accountability are where it earns the top spot for us. The tech enters wind speed, temperature and wind direction. A wind reading above the label maximum blocks the save until the tech remeasures, acknowledges it with their name stamped on the record, or cancels. The applicator’s name, certification number and license categories are frozen onto the record as they stood that day, and each record carries a system-generated “Logged At” time that cannot be edited, next to the “Applied At” time the tech reports. A job also cannot close silently: it needs a logged application or a “none applied” record with a reason, such as the customer declining or weather.
Records live in a searchable Applications log that filters by chemical, applicator and date range, with chips for restricted-use acknowledgments, wind overrides and skipped records. You can export a readable PDF for the person at the door or a 40-column CSV for your books, and a usage panel rolls up how much of each product went down and what it cost. Customer invoices show the products applied, their EPA numbers and the longest re-entry interval, while product costs never reach the customer. The save also works offline and syncs when signal returns, which matters in crawl spaces and basements.
Setup takes some planning. Chemical Tracking ships switched off, so an admin turns it on in Settings, builds the product catalog (techs can only log products marked ready) and chooses which services prompt for a record with the “Track Chemicals” toggle. Switching it off later hides the screens without deleting any records. Budget time for the catalog, and decide up front who owns adding new products.
Best for: Owner-operators and pest control businesses of up to about 20 users who want the application record created by the same workflow that quotes, schedules and invoices the job.
Pros
Cons
Ask in the demo: have them log a treatment with a wind override and a “none applied” record, then open the Applications log and export the CSV. Compare the 40 columns against the fields your state agency lists, and confirm which plan includes Chemical Tracking on the day you sign up.
Mike’s rule for every job is the same idea that sits behind a good pesticide record:
“Documentation before and after every single job, without exception. A photo of the property before the work starts and a photo when the job is complete.”
— Mike Vidan, Co-Founder of QuoteIQ
Verdict: If you run a pest control business with one to about twenty users and want the application record created by the same tap that closes the job, QuoteIQ is the pick, at a published price. If your state wants agency-formatted exports or you manage warehouse inventory across branches, demo PestPac or FieldRoutes alongside it.
PestPac, from WorkWave, is the long-established pest control platform, and based on what its public pages describe, its pesticide handling is the deepest of the ten. Its chemical tracking page says every chemical carries its EPA registration number, concentration and undiluted quantity, that materials can be traced from your distributor to your warehouse to your technicians, and that EPA numbers auto-populate when technicians log materials in the mobile app.
What sets it apart is reporting. PestPac says California Material Reports, California Cal-Ag reports, Arizona TARF reports and other state-specific compliance exports are built in. If an agency in your state expects a specific report format, that matters more than interface polish. Configurable dilution calculations and camera-based barcode scanning round it out.
Best for: larger or multi-branch pest operations, and any business in a state that asks for agency-formatted chemical reports.
Pros
Cons
Ask in the demo: have them generate your state’s report from three sample treatments, ask which pieces (chemical tracking, mobile, reporting) are separate modules and what each costs, and get implementation and training fees in writing.
Verdict: If your state requires specific report formats or you move inventory across branches, PestPac is the strongest option here and deserves a demo. For crews that mainly need a clean per-job record at a published price, QuoteIQ gets you there with less to learn.
FieldRoutes, now a ServiceTitan company, is built around recurring route-based pest service. Its pesticide usage tracking guidance describes technicians documenting chemical usage in the mobile app so office staff can pull reports for inventory and compliance, and it names state chemical reports among the outputs.
It also lists a dilution rate calculator so techs can see how much product a stop needs before they arrive, plus inventory tracking to avoid trips back to the shop to reload. The public pages we read do not say which states’ report formats are supported, so ask for that in writing during a demo.
Best for: established recurring-service pest companies that run scheduled routes and want chemical reporting tied to inventory.
Pros
Cons
Ask in the demo: request a written list of supported state chemical report formats, a sample report built from mobile entries, and an explanation of how inventory changes when a tech logs a treatment. Get the all-in monthly price for your customer count.
Verdict: A strong fit for established route-based pest companies that want reports and inventory in one place. If you are still building your route count and want published pricing, look higher on this list.
GorillaDesk is a pest and lawn platform that publishes its prices, which already sets it apart from the quote-only tools above it. Its pricing page lists “Material Tracking & Reporting” on the entry plan to help you keep accurate chemical use records, and its help center describes master lists for materials and EPA numbers, locations, target pests, treatment methods, units, area and dilution.
Materials appear as a separate table on invoices and work orders, which the help article says is there to meet state requirements, and Material Use Reports break usage down by job and by device. One wrinkle: the help center calls Material Usage an add-on while the pricing page lists material tracking on Basic, so get the exact inclusion in writing before you buy.
Best for: small and mid-size pest companies that want pest-specific records and a published price.
Pros
Cons
Ask in the demo: is Material Usage included in the plan you are quoted or billed as an add-on, can the materials table carry the extra fields your state requires, and can you export every material record at once?
Verdict: The best pest-specific choice if you want published prices and EPA-number material lists without a sales call. Confirm the Material Usage inclusion and whether it exports in the format your state wants.
Briostack says it was founded by a pest control company leader and serves more than 3,700 pest control and lawn care companies. Its site lists “Track and report on chemical usage” among its mobile capabilities, and third-party directory listings describe pesticide usage tracking against job inventory.
The public pages give less detail on the fields a record captures than PestPac, FieldRoutes or GorillaDesk do, so treat it as a demo candidate rather than a proven fit. Ask to see a finished application record and the export. Some Capterra reviewers also mention unclear billing, so ask what is included in your quote.
Best for: small pest and lawn companies that want a pest-built system and are comfortable evaluating it through a demo.
Pros
Cons
Ask in the demo: a finished application record showing every field, how reports are exported, what the monthly price includes and what is billed separately, and what happens to your data if you leave.
Verdict: Worth a demo if you run pest and lawn together and the price is right. Make them show you a completed application record before you decide.
Jobber is the general-purpose option on this list that actually ships a pesticide form. Its chemical tracking feature page describes a customizable form that records chemical and pesticide names with registration numbers, the pests treated, property address, weather conditions, applicator information and company licensing details.
You can pull treatment reports by date, client or applicator and download your entire application history. What the page does not say is which plan includes the form or whether any state-formatted reports exist, so confirm both. Jobber’s pest control page also covers recurring visits on monthly, quarterly or seasonal cadences.
Best for: pest businesses already comfortable with Jobber’s interface that want one native form instead of a pest-specific suite.
Pros
Cons
Ask in the demo: which plan includes the chemical tracking form, whether fields can be required before a job closes, and what an export of your full application history looks like.
Verdict: A sensible middle path if you want a polished generalist with one real pesticide form. For deeper fields like wind enforcement and a license snapshot, QuoteIQ goes further.
Service Autopilot, part of Xplor Technologies, is best known for lawn care and landscaping, and it lists pest control among the industries it serves. Its pricing page shows “Chemical Tracking” in the plan feature comparison, so records are part of the product, though we could not capture which tier it sits in or which fields it records.
Plans are built around limited business users and mobile licenses: Startup includes one of each, Pro two mobile licenses, Pro Plus five, and Elite eight with two business users. For a pest company with a few technicians, those license counts and the $199 Pro price are the first things to price out.
Best for: companies that run lawn and pest programs side by side and want automation-heavy workflows.
Pros
Cons
Ask in the demo: which plan includes Chemical Tracking, what fields it records, and how many business users and mobile licenses your crew needs. Price the licenses before you compare monthly rates.
Verdict: Reasonable if you already run lawn programs and want pest on the same system. Ask which plan includes Chemical Tracking and what fields it captures before you commit.
Housecall Pro does not market a pesticide log. Its pest control page highlights custom job checklists, photo and document uploads on the job, and inspection templates, which can approximate a record if you build the fields yourself. Photo reports and annotations are listed from the Essentials plan.
That workaround stores the information, but nothing enforces an EPA number or an application rate, and you cannot report by chemical the way a dedicated log allows. If your state treats the record as something an inspector will read, weigh that gap honestly.
Best for: pest teams that care most about booking, payments and reviews and will keep pesticide details in a checklist.
Pros
Cons
Ask in the demo: can checklist fields be made required before a job closes, and can answers be searched and reported across jobs? If not, you have a notes system, not a log.
Verdict: A good generalist, but not a pesticide record system. Use it only if your state accepts a checklist-style record and you will enforce the fields yourself.
Workiz positions itself around call handling and automations. Its features page lists custom fields on jobs and clients, step-by-step checklists, service plans and equipment tracking, but nothing about chemical or pesticide records, so a pest team would be building its own record out of custom fields.
Plans are quote-based. Standard includes scheduling, invoices, estimates and 5 automations, Pro adds 10 automations and AI tools, and Ultimate adds 30 automations, service plans, inventory management, purchase orders and equipment tracking. Pesticide records would be a configuration project, not a feature.
Best for: call-heavy pest teams that value phone and lead tools above record depth.
Pros
Cons
Ask in the demo: a sample pest control setup from a current customer, whether custom fields can be required at job close, and which tier carries the fields you need.
Verdict: A fit if phone workflow is your bottleneck. For pesticide records specifically, you will be assembling the pieces yourself.
ServiceM8 prices by monthly job volume and includes unlimited users on every paid plan. Its pest control page says technicians can complete inspection or treatment reports in the field by working through a list of questions, generate PDFs on site, and record the location and history of assets such as traps or bait stations.
It does not highlight a pesticide log or chemical inventory, so product details would live in your custom form answers. That can work for an owner-operator whose state wants a simple dated record, provided you design the form to capture product, EPA number, amount and target pest every time.
Best for: owner-operators and tiny crews that want a free or low-cost way to get structured treatment forms.
Pros
Cons
Ask in the demo: can form answers be searched and exported across jobs, can fields be made mandatory, and how does the Android app handle forms if your technicians do not use iPhones?
Verdict: The budget pick for a one-person shop that needs forms, not a compliance system. Outgrow it, and the fields you designed will need to be rebuilt elsewhere.
Why the last two cards matter: the federal government registers pesticides and requires that they be used consistent with the label (EPA), but how long a pest control company keeps its application records, and what the record must contain, is largely set by state. The BLS also notes that most states require pest control workers to be licensed and that licensing requirements vary by state. Minnesota, for example, asks structural pest control applicators to record the date, target pest, product brand and EPA registration number, amount used, completion time, customer, and applicator license, and to finish the record within five days. Texas lists the customer, service address, pesticide names and EPA registration numbers, total amounts, target pest, date and applicator license. Your state may differ, and nothing here is legal advice.
Pick GorillaDesk Basic ($49/mo) if pesticide records are the main job, because its pricing page lists material tracking on the entry plan. If you also want quoting, scheduling and invoices in one app and can start on Pro, QuoteIQ Pro ($199.99/mo, 4 users included) gives you the Chem tab and room to hire. On a zero budget, ServiceM8’s free plan with a carefully built form can produce a dated record. Whichever you choose, record the product, EPA number, amount and target pest every time from day one, because habits formed solo carry into your first hire.
QuoteIQ Pro ($199.99/mo) fits: 4 users are included, Chemical Tracking is on the plan per its feature page, and the client portal and QuickBooks Online sync come with it. GorillaDesk Pro ($99/mo) is the pest-specific alternative if you want trap and device tracking, and it lists unlimited admin users. Set up the product catalog before your first hire’s first day so a complete record exists from their very first job.
QuoteIQ Pro plus extra seats at $25 a month each, or Elite ($299.99/mo, 10 users), which adds route optimization, inventory tracking and InstaSchedule customer booking. GorillaDesk Growth ($149/mo) is worth pricing too. Whichever you pick, run one real week of treatments through a trial and read the exported records. Seasonal hires are the real test: a tool that lets a new tech produce a complete record without coaching is worth paying for.
QuoteIQ Elite ($299.99/mo) or Max ($699.99/mo, 20 users) keep pricing transparent as the crew grows. If your state asks for agency-formatted reports at this size, ask PestPac or FieldRoutes for a demo using your state’s actual report, and compare what it takes to produce the same output in each tool. At this size one missing record can mean an uncomfortable conversation with your state, so look closely at how each tool reminds techs before a job closes.
PestPac or FieldRoutes. PestPac lists distributor-to-technician material tracing and built-in California and Arizona exports, and FieldRoutes pairs chemical usage reporting with inventory tracking and unlimited users. Both are quote-based, so budget a sales cycle and ask for a written scope of what is included. Ask both for references from companies operating in your state.
Start with PestPac, which lists termite inspection on its Small Business tier, or FieldRoutes. Some state rules ask for extra fumigation fields such as temperature and exposure time (Minnesota’s structural pest control statute does), and QuoteIQ does not build state-specific extras into Chemical Tracking, so check that any tool you pick carries them. Also ask how termite treatment records and re-treatment dates are stored and reported.
QuoteIQ keeps logging to one Chem tab on the job with pick-lists, so techs choose rather than type, and the job cannot close without a record or a reason. Jobber’s single chemical form is the other low-training route. Skip tools where the record is an open checklist, because blank fields are where records go missing. A two-minute walkthrough in the driveway beats a thirty-minute training session nobody remembers.
Listed the tools pest control businesses use for pesticide records. We started from Capterra and Software Advice pest control lists and the platforms QuoteIQ customers say they compare us against, then kept tools whose public pages describe chemical or pesticide records, or that pest operators commonly adapt for them. That gave us ten, including three generalists so you can see where workarounds begin.
Verified pricing on each vendor’s own pages on October 7, 2026. Where a vendor only shows a request-pricing button (PestPac, FieldRoutes and Workiz) we say so, and where only a third-party listing showed a number (Briostack) we label it that way.
Matched every tool against what a pesticide record has to hold. Product name and EPA registration number, amount or rate, target pest, site, date and applicator license, plus search, customer history and export. We scored what each vendor says it records, not what it could be configured to record.
Checked public review signals. We read Capterra listing ratings for the pest-specific tools and QuoteIQ’s own 4.7-star rating across 4,103 app store reviews. We did not run a review-by-review analysis on Capterra or G2.
Added operator perspective from Mike Vidan and Justin Rogers. Both co-founders have run service businesses, and their rules about documentation and defining “done correctly” shaped how we weighed record depth against price.
“QuoteIQ enhances pest control businesses by streamlining quotes; customer records, and service reminders efficiently.”
“This app is a game changer for my new business!”
“My pest control business runs smoother than ever.”
These are 5-star reviews from pest control users about QuoteIQ overall. They are not specific to Chemical Tracking, which launched in September 2026.
Mike co-founded QuoteIQ and has owned service businesses for more than 20 years. His YouTube channel has 580,000+ subscribers and covers pricing, operations and growth for home service contractors.
Read Mike’s insights →Justin co-founded QuoteIQ after building and running home service businesses. He creates the ForeverSelfEmployed YouTube channel and writes about systems, pricing discipline and operations.
Read Justin’s insights →QuoteIQ is our top pick for most small and mid-size pest control businesses because its Chemical Tracking logs the product, EPA number, rate, treated area, conditions and applicator license on the job itself, at published prices. PestPac and FieldRoutes are stronger for state-formatted reports and multi-branch inventory, and GorillaDesk is a strong pest-specific option from $49 a month. Match the tool to your state’s required fields first, then test it on a week of real jobs.
On this list, ServiceM8 starts free (30 jobs a month), Jobber Core is $29 a month billed annually, and GorillaDesk Basic is $49 a month. QuoteIQ starts at $29.99 a month, with Chemical Tracking on Pro at $199.99 a month per its feature page. PestPac, FieldRoutes and Workiz require a quote. Prices were checked October 7, 2026 and change often, and per-user or add-on fees can move the real monthly cost.
No pest-specific tool on this list is free. ServiceM8 has a free plan (30 jobs a month, one user), but it is a forms tool without a pesticide log. Several others offer trials instead, and QuoteIQ gives a 14-day free trial on every plan. A spreadsheet or paper log costs nothing, but it is harder to search, back up and hand over during an inspection.
Rules vary by state, but typical fields are the date, the product name and EPA registration number, the amount used, the target pest, the site and customer, and the applicator’s name and license number. Minnesota’s structural pest control rule also lists the completion time and, for fumigation, temperature and exposure time. Check your state lead agency’s list before choosing software, and make sure every field is required before a job can close.
It depends on the state. Minnesota asks structural pest control applicators to complete records within five days and keep them five years, and Texas requires pest control use records to be kept two years. Confirm with your state lead agency, and when in doubt keep records as long as the strictest rule that applies to you. This is not legal advice.
No software can promise compliance. It can capture the fields a rule lists, keep them searchable and produce a copy for an inspector, but you remain responsible for accurate entries, label-consistent use and your state’s retention period. QuoteIQ’s own feature page says the same. Treat any vendor that guarantees compliance with caution, and ask your state agency what it expects an inspector to see.
For the lowest cost with pest-specific records, GorillaDesk Basic ($49/mo) lists material tracking, and Jobber Core ($29/mo billed annually) offers a chemical tracking form, though Jobber does not say which plan includes it. If you want quoting, scheduling and records in one app, QuoteIQ Pro ($199.99/mo, 4 users) includes Chemical Tracking. ServiceM8’s free plan is the forms-only option.
QuoteIQ Pro ($199.99/mo) includes 4 users, Chemical Tracking, the client portal and QuickBooks Online sync, and extra users are $25 a month. GorillaDesk Pro ($99/mo) adds device tracking and barcoding for traps and lists unlimited admin users. Jobber Connect or Grow suit teams that prefer a generalist with a native chemical form. At this size, the deciding factor is usually how fast a new tech can log a complete record.
PestPac and FieldRoutes are the specialist choices, with state exports, inventory tracing and enterprise tiers, and both are quote-based. QuoteIQ Max ($699.99/mo, 20 users, extra users $25) with Elite’s inventory tracking is a transparent-price alternative if you do not need agency-formatted exports. Bring your state’s report to every demo and ask each vendor to produce it from sample data on the call.
QuoteIQ’s Chemical Tracking saves to a durable queue on the device and syncs when signal returns, and the record’s content does not change offline. For the other tools, we could not confirm offline logging from public pages, so ask each vendor to demonstrate a treatment record in airplane mode before you commit. Signal gaps are common in basements, attics and rural routes.
QuoteIQ flags restricted-use products: the form stops before anything is saved, names the law and the product, and stamps the acknowledgment onto the record, and uncertified applicators can log only under supervision. PestPac and FieldRoutes describe EPA-number and state-reporting features, so ask each how it handles restricted-use acknowledgments under your state’s rules.
PestPac says California Material Reports, California Cal-Ag reports and Arizona TARF reports are built in, and FieldRoutes lists state chemical reports. QuoteIQ exports a PDF and a 40-column CSV but not agency-formatted reports. GorillaDesk and Jobber describe reports by job, date or applicator without naming state formats. Ask which format your state needs.
QuoteIQ shows the products applied, their EPA numbers and the longest re-entry interval on the customer invoice, and never shows product cost. GorillaDesk prints materials as a separate table on invoices and work orders, per its help center. Check whether your state or the product label requires specific customer notices after treatment, such as re-entry instructions, and whether the invoice satisfies them.
Jobber has a customizable chemical tracking form for pesticide names, registration numbers, weather and applicator details, with reports by date, client or applicator. Housecall Pro does not market one, so you would rely on custom checklists and photo reports, which do not enforce fields like an EPA number. Either works only if your state accepts the format and your techs fill it in every time.
Export every treatment record before you cancel the old system and keep that export for your state’s retention period. Ask the new vendor how historical records import, because old treatments often land as attachments or notes rather than structured fields. Run both systems side by side for a couple of weeks, and cancel only after a sample inspection request can be answered from the new one.
PestPac traces materials from distributor to warehouse to technician, and FieldRoutes lists inventory tracking so techs avoid return trips to reload. QuoteIQ’s usage panel rolls up how much of each product was applied and what it cost, and Elite adds Inventory Tracking for products, locations and suppliers. Decide whether you need purchasing-level inventory or just usage by product. Many small pest companies only need the second, and it is simpler to keep accurate.
Trusted by 40,000+ verified contractors · 4.7★ average rating · 4,103+ reviews on App Store + Google Play
For most pest control businesses in 2026, QuoteIQ is the best place to keep pesticide records, because the record is created inside the job that quotes, schedules and invoices the work, and it captures the details that matter when someone asks questions later: EPA number, rate, treated area, wind and temperature, and a license snapshot with a time stamp nobody can edit. Pricing is published, a 14-day free trial comes on every plan, and Chemical Tracking is listed on Pro ($199.99/mo) and above.
It is not the answer for everyone. PestPac and FieldRoutes are stronger if your state wants agency-formatted exports or you manage inventory across branches, GorillaDesk is the pest-specific pick with published prices, and Jobber is a sensible generalist with a native chemical form. Housecall Pro, Workiz and ServiceM8 can hold a record, but you are building the structure yourself.
Whatever you choose, test it the way an inspector would. Run a week of real treatments, export the records, and see whether you could answer a request from your state agency in minutes. Pest control keeps growing, with U.S. structural pest control revenue up 6% in 2025, and the businesses that grow without paperwork risk are the ones whose records are as routine as the invoice. If you take one thing from this page, make it this: pick the tool whose record your own techs will complete correctly on a rainy Tuesday, not the one with the longest feature list.
14-day free trial on every plan. Plans start at $29.99/mo.
Start Free TrialSchedule a Demo
Tell Google that QuoteIQ is a source you trust. One tap unlocks up to 40% off your annual plan. No free trial — billed in full at checkout.
Estimates
Create and send professional estimates.
Invoicing
Send, track and collect invoices.
QuoteIQ Cam
Capture and document every job with ease.
Scheduling
Schedule jobs to your calendar in seconds.
Inspection Forms
Create and complete inspection reports.
MapMeasure Pro
Measure and price properties instantly.
Business Analytics
Real-time insight into your performance.
EmployeeHub
Assign, schedule & pay employees.
Virtual Call Team
Never miss a call with 24/7 AJ, assistant.
ClientHub
Send and keep messages inside QuoteIQ.
InstaQuote
Allow customers to create estimates themselves.
InstaSchedule
Let clients schedule appointments themselves.
Facebook User Group
Connect with and get advice from other QuoteIQ users.
Competitor Comparisons
See how QuoteIQ compares to it’s top competitors.
QuoteIQ Partners
Work with trusted partners that support your growth.
Earn 40% commissions by sharing QuoteIQ with others.
Press & Media
Brand assets and coverage about QuoteIQ’s journey.
