QuoteIQ

Top 10 in 2026 · From the QuoteIQ Team

Top 10 CRMs with Chemical Tracking for Contractors in 2026

If your crew sprays, treats, fertilizes or mixes anything with an EPA number on the label, your CRM is also your paper trail. We compared 10 platforms on how they record a chemical application, what the rest of the software does around that record, what it costs, and where each one falls short.

Quick Answer

The best CRM with chemical tracking for most contractors in 2026 is QuoteIQ. It keeps the application record (product, EPA number, rate, area, weather and applicator license) inside the same job that holds the estimate, schedule and invoice. PestPac and FieldRoutes go deeper on state reporting for large pest control operations. Spraye and GorillaDesk are strong spray-route specialists. Jobber, Housecall Pro and Workiz can work if you build the forms yourself. QuoteIQ’s feature page lists Chemical Tracking on Pro and above, at $199.99 a month, with a 14-day free trial.

The Short Version

10 CRMs with Chemical Tracking at a Glance

RankPlatformChemical record styleStarting priceBest forStandout
#1QuoteIQA: built into the jobCRM from $29.99/mo · Chemical Tracking on Pro, $199.99/moContractors who quote, schedule, invoice and treat in one appEPA product catalog, rate × area totals, wind block, license snapshot
#2PestPacB: pest specialistCustom — contact salesLarge pest control firms filing state reportsCalifornia, Cal-Ag and Arizona TARF exports
#3FieldRoutesB: pest and lawn specialistCustom — contact salesGrowing recurring-route pest and lawn companiesChemical usage in the tech app, state reports, inventory
#4SprayeB: spray-route specialistFrom $79.99/moLawn and pest companies that want published pricingCompliance reporting is core to the product
#5GorillaDeskA: built into the jobBasic $49/mo · Pro $99/moSmall pest and lawn companies on a budgetMaterials and EPA numbers on work orders and invoices
#6Service AutopilotA: built into the jobFrom $49/mo (annual billing)Lawn and landscape companies with recurring programsChemical Tracking named in its plan comparison
#7Real GreenB: lawn specialistCustom — contact salesEstablished lawn care companiesLawn-program focus
#8JobberC: build your own formCore $29/mo annual · $49 monthlyContractors who want a polished generalistCustomizable chemical tracking form
#9Housecall ProC: checklists onlyBasic $59/mo annual · $79 monthlyResidential contractors who prioritize bookingCustom checklists and photo reports
#10WorkizC: custom fieldsCustom — contact salesPhone-heavy small teamsCustom fields and checklists

Prices come from vendor pages checked October 7–8, 2026, and annual-billing rates are labeled. “Custom — contact sales” means we could not find a published price, and we did not guess. Vendors change pricing often, so confirm current rates before you buy.

What “Chemical Tracking” Actually Means in a CRM

Every vendor on this list says it tracks chemicals. Very few mean the same thing. For a pest, lawn or landscape crew, a usable chemical record answers a regulator’s question (or a customer’s lawyer’s) without anyone reconstructing the visit from memory. At a minimum, that record holds eight things:

  1. The product and its EPA registration number. Picked from a list, not typed from memory off a jug.
  2. Rate, area and total. How much per 1,000 square feet or per acre, how large the treated area was, and how much product that added up to.
  3. The place. Customer, property and the specific site treated, such as lawn, beds, foundation or trees.
  4. The time. A date and a time stamp the applicator can’t quietly edit later.
  5. The person. Applicator name and license number as they stood that day, not as they read after a renewal.
  6. The conditions. Wind speed and direction plus temperature, because product labels set limits for both.
  7. The re-entry interval. How long people and pets should stay off the area, ideally carried onto the invoice the customer receives.
  8. Proof that nothing happened, too. A record for every visit, including visits where nothing was applied, so a gap in the log means something.

Regulations decide which of these you must keep. Federal law requires certified applicators who use restricted-use pesticides to keep application records for two years (7 U.S.C. 136i-1; see also the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service recordkeeping page and EPA’s certification standards). States layer on their own fields, deadlines and retention periods. Minnesota, for example, expects records to be completed within five days and kept for five years (Minn. Stat. 18B.37). This page is general information, not legal advice. Your state lead agency sets the rules for your license.

The software on this list falls into three styles, and every entry below carries a label so you can compare like with like:

How We Picked the Top 10

We’re QuoteIQ. We made this list. We also put our own platform first, so here is exactly how the ranking worked, what we could and couldn’t verify, and where every tool, ours included, falls short. Five criteria drove each ranking decision:

  1. Depth of the chemical record. Does it capture the eight items above, and does it make skipping them hard?
  2. Reporting and exports. Can you pull a customer’s treatment history, filter an applications log and export something an inspector can read? Do state-formatted reports exist?
  3. Fit with the rest of the contractor workflow. Estimates, scheduling, invoicing, photos and a phone app that copes with weak signal, because a record only gets filled in if it’s convenient.
  4. Pricing transparency and total cost. Published prices scored higher than quote-only pricing. Where we couldn’t verify a price, we wrote “Custom — contact sales.”
  5. Honest limitations. Every entry has cons, ours included, and anything we couldn’t confirm is labeled as unconfirmed.

For sources, we used vendor pricing and product pages checked October 7–8, 2026, plus directory listings where a vendor publishes little. We did not run hands-on tests of competitor software, and we did not aggregate competitor review scores. The only rating on this page is QuoteIQ’s own 4.7 average across 4,103+ App Store and Google Play reviews. Where two sources disagreed, the entry says so instead of quoting the friendlier number.

We did not review FieldEdge, or ServiceTitan’s own platform, for a chemical log in this update, so neither is ranked. ServiceTitan owns FieldRoutes, which is #3. Rankings reflect documented capability for contractors who apply chemicals and say nothing about any product for other jobs.

We read each vendor’s product, help and pricing pages and wrote down only what they say. Where a page was silent, the entry says we could not find it, which is not the same as the feature not existing. That is why every entry ends with a question to ask in the demo.

“You define what ‘done correctly’ looks like in writing, then you measure against it every time.”

— Justin Rogers, Co-Founder of QuoteIQ

1

QuoteIQ — Best Overall CRM with Chemical Tracking

CRM from $29.99/mo · Chemical Tracking on Pro ($199.99/mo) per its feature page · 14-day free trialStyle A · Chemical record built into the job

QuoteIQ is our platform, so weigh this entry accordingly and check every claim against the Chemical Tracking feature page. We put it first because chemical tracking only works if crews actually fill it in, and crews fill in whatever lives on the screen they already use. In QuoteIQ the record is a tab on the job. That same job carries the estimate, the schedule, the photos, the invoice and the customer’s history, so there is no second app to open at the end of a treatment and no clipboard to lose in the truck.

Here is what the record does, based on the feature page and our product documentation:

  • Product catalog with EPA numbers. Build your list of products once. Pick one on the job and its EPA registration number comes with it.
  • Rate × area = total. Enter the rate and the area treated and QuoteIQ calculates the total product used, so nobody does that math on the tailgate.
  • Weather with a safety rail. Wind speed, wind direction and temperature are recorded on the application. A wind reading over the label maximum stops the save, and a temperature outside the label range raises a warning. Restricted-use products ask the applicator to acknowledge that status before saving.
  • License snapshot. The applicator’s license details are frozen onto the record when it’s saved, so renewing or editing a profile later never rewrites history.
  • System time stamp. A “Logged At” time is set by the system, not typed by the user.
  • A record every time. A job can’t be closed until chemicals are logged or the visit is marked “none applied,” so gaps in the log mean something.
  • Applications log and exports. Filter by product, applicator, customer or date, then export a PDF or a 40-column CSV. Each customer’s Treatment History also shows on their contact record.
  • Customer-ready invoices. The invoice lists the products used, their EPA numbers and the longest re-entry interval. Your product cost stays hidden from the customer.
  • Offline queue. Entries made with no signal are held on the phone and sent when service returns.

Around the record sits the rest of a contractor CRM. MapMeasure Pro (Beginner and above) measures lawns, beds and driveways from satellite imagery, so rate × area starts from a real number. Recurring service plans are on every plan. QuoteIQ Cam photo documentation starts on Beginner. Pro adds the client portal, ClientHub texting, job costing and QuickBooks Online sync, and Elite adds route optimization and inventory tracking. Every plan includes AI tools and business calculators, including a Downstream Injector Calculator for crews that mix at a ratio.

On cost: per its feature page, Chemical Tracking is available on Pro and above. Pro is $199.99 a month with 4 users included, or $1,999.99 a year (two months free). Extra users are $25 a month. Every plan has a 14-day free trial. Plan tiers can change, so confirm it on a demo or inside the app before you commit. See all plans on the QuoteIQ pricing page.

Best for: Contractors who quote, schedule, invoice and apply chemicals in the same business: lawn care, landscaping, pest control, weed control, tree and shrub care, and pressure washing or soft washing crews that use chemical products.

Pros

  • The record lives inside the job, the invoice and the customer’s history, with no second app
  • Hard stops where it matters: no closing a job without a record, and a wind-over-label block
  • License snapshot and system time stamp make a record harder to dispute
  • Entries can be made offline from the phone and sync when service returns
  • Published pricing, and a 14-day free trial on every plan
  • Estimating, scheduling, payments and AI tools in the same app, not a stack of add-ons

Cons

  • Per its feature page, Chemical Tracking starts on Pro ($199.99/mo), so Essentials and Beginner users have to upgrade
  • No agency-formatted state report exports. You get PDF and CSV, which means filing state forms is still on you, and PestPac and FieldRoutes lead here
  • Chemical Tracking launched in September 2026, so it has less field history than the specialists
  • Route optimization sits on Elite ($299.99/mo), so very large route-density lawn operations may want a route specialist
  • Users beyond the 4 included on Pro cost $25 a month each

“Documentation is not bureaucracy. It is your protection, and it costs nothing but the habit.”

— Mike Vidan, Co-Founder of QuoteIQ

Ask in the demo: Open a trial job, add a product with an EPA number, then try to close the job without logging a chemical. Ask which plan includes Chemical Tracking today, and what your state’s inspectors expect to see.

Verdict: If you win work with estimates and invoices and also have to prove what you sprayed, QuoteIQ is the strongest all-in-one fit on this list. If your main headache is filing state-specific reports for dozens of technicians, look at PestPac or FieldRoutes first.

Watch What Is QuoteIQ? →

Start QuoteIQ Free Trial Schedule a Demo See Chemical Tracking

2

PestPac — Best for Large Pest Control Companies with State Reporting

Custom — contact salesStyle B · Pest specialist platform

PestPac, from WorkWave, is a long-running pest management platform, and its chemical tracking page is the most compliance-heavy of any vendor we checked. It describes state-ready reporting, including California Material Reports plus Cal-Ag and Arizona TARF exports, EPA numbers that fill in automatically in the technician app, and tracing from distributor to warehouse to technician.

That depth is aimed at pest control companies with office staff who administer the system. Pricing is quote-only, and the platform is shaped around pest control first. A contractor who also sells one-off projects, such as a landscape install or an exterior wash, will find QuoteIQ’s estimate-to-invoice flow simpler. A pest company running routes across states with regulators watching will find PestPac’s reporting hard to beat.

Against QuoteIQ: PestPac wins on state-formatted reporting and pest-specific depth. QuoteIQ wins on published pricing, a 14-day free trial on every plan, and carrying estimating, invoicing, payments and AI tools in the same app. Choose by whether your reporting obligations or your sales workflow is the bigger constraint.

Best for: Multi-technician pest control companies that file state material-use reports.

Pros

  • State-formatted exports for California, Cal-Ag and Arizona TARF
  • EPA numbers populate in the technician app
  • Traces product from distributor to warehouse to technician
  • Established in pest control, with a large installed base

Cons

  • Pricing isn’t published, so budgeting starts with a sales call
  • Built around pest control, so project-style estimating is not its center of gravity
  • Expect an implementation period and office-side administration
  • We found no published free trial

Ask in the demo: Which state reports are included in my plan and which cost extra? How long does onboarding take, and who owns data entry for products and EPA numbers?

Verdict: The reporting specialist. If you are a larger pest company in a state with formatted reporting requirements, put PestPac on your shortlist ahead of the generalists.

Compare QuoteIQ vs PestPac

3

FieldRoutes — Best for Growing Recurring-Route Pest and Lawn Companies

Custom — contact salesStyle B · Pest and lawn specialist platform

FieldRoutes is a route-based platform for pest control and lawn care, now part of ServiceTitan. Its published material on pesticide usage tracking and its product pages describe chemical usage recorded in the technician app, state chemical reports, inventory tracking and unlimited users, which is a meaningful point for crews that add seasonal techs.

The model fits companies that sell recurring service to hundreds or thousands of customers and want the chemical record to flow from the route. The cost and complexity grow with that scale. For a three-person crew, you would be buying a platform designed for a much larger operation, and pricing is quote-only so you can’t test that assumption without a sales conversation.

Against QuoteIQ: FieldRoutes brings scale features, such as unlimited users and state reports, that QuoteIQ does not match for route books of thousands of customers. QuoteIQ’s pricing is published, a trial is available to start the same day, and the same app handles one-off estimates and invoices.

Best for: Pest and lawn companies running recurring routes with many customers and several technicians.

Pros

  • Chemical usage recorded in the technician app
  • State chemical reports and inventory tracking
  • Unlimited users, per its product pages
  • Built for subscription-style recurring service

Cons

  • Quote-only pricing
  • Heavy for crews under about five technicians
  • Not designed for one-off project quoting
  • We found no published free trial

Ask in the demo: Which state reports can I file straight from the platform? Is “unlimited users” in writing? What does the ServiceTitan relationship change about support and roadmap?

Verdict: A strong route-and-compliance platform for companies already at scale. Smaller crews get more flexibility, and a lower bill, from Style A tools.

Compare QuoteIQ vs FieldRoutes

4

Spraye — Best Spray-Route Specialist with Published Pricing

From $79.99/mo · Premium about $400/mo ($4,223.88 billed annually)Style B · Spray-route specialist

Spraye builds software for businesses whose day is sprayed, mostly lawn care and pest control. Its chemical tracking and compliance reporting page treats the chemical record as the core of the product rather than a module bolted on, and its pricing is published, which is rare in this category. We checked it on October 7, 2026: plans start at $79.99 a month, and the Premium tier runs about $400 a month or $4,223.88 billed annually.

The gap to watch is breadth. Spraye is strongest on recurring spray programs and less obviously a fit for contractors who also sell installs, repairs or estimate-heavy project work. We also found no published free trial, so you would evaluate it through a demo.

Against QuoteIQ: Spraye is more specialized and QuoteIQ is broader. At $79.99 a month Spraye is cheaper at entry than QuoteIQ Pro at $199.99, but its Premium tier at about $400 a month costs roughly twice QuoteIQ Pro, so the right comparison depends on which Spraye tier you would actually need.

Best for: Lawn and pest companies that want chemical compliance as the center of the CRM and prefer published pricing.

Pros

  • Chemical tracking and compliance reporting are core features
  • Published tiers, so budgeting is straightforward
  • Built around recurring spray routes
  • Strong fit for lawn care and pest control crews

Cons

  • No published free trial that we could find
  • Premium tier (about $400/mo) costs roughly twice QuoteIQ Pro
  • Narrower for project-style estimating
  • Less of an all-in-one if you also need payments, texting or AI tools

Ask in the demo: Which tier includes compliance reports? Are there per-user or per-route fees? Can I run a pilot on real routes before I sign an annual plan?

Verdict: A serious specialist with honest pricing. If spraying is 90% of your work, it deserves a demo; if you also sell projects, a Style A platform will bundle more.

5

GorillaDesk — Best Budget-Friendly Pest and Lawn CRM

Basic $49/mo ($539/yr) · Pro $99/moStyle A · Chemical record built into the job

GorillaDesk is a pest control and lawn care CRM with some of the lowest published prices on this list: Basic is $49 a month ($539 a year) and Pro is $99 a month, as we checked October 7, 2026. Its help center describes a materials and EPA number list that appears on work orders and invoices, which covers the basics of a chemical record at a price a small crew can stomach.

One conflict is worth resolving before you sign. GorillaDesk’s Material Usage add-on page describes material tracking as an add-on, while its plans and pricing article lists materials among plan features. The two don’t clearly agree, so ask exactly what is included in Basic and Pro. We also did not find state-formatted exports in its public pages.

Against QuoteIQ: GorillaDesk Pro at $99 a month costs about half of QuoteIQ Pro. QuoteIQ’s rule-based record, with a license snapshot, a wind-over-label block and a required entry before a job closes, is the part to compare line by line, because we did not find the same rules described in GorillaDesk’s public pages.

Best for: Small pest control and lawn care companies that want a published, low entry price with a materials list on work orders.

Pros

  • Low published prices that start at $49/mo
  • Materials and EPA numbers appear on work orders and invoices
  • Built for pest and lawn routes
  • Quick to learn for small crews

Cons

  • Add-on versus included-in-plan ambiguity for material usage
  • No state-formatted exports in what we read
  • Lighter on estimating and project work than QuoteIQ
  • Fewer automation and AI tools than all-in-one competitors

Ask in the demo: Is material usage included in Basic or Pro, or is it a paid add-on? What does the work order show an inspector? Can I export a log by date range?

Verdict: The budget option for small pest and lawn crews. Resolve the add-on question first, and compare the all-in monthly cost against QuoteIQ Pro.

6

Service Autopilot — Best for Lawn and Landscape Companies Built on Recurring Programs

Startup from $49/mo (annual billing)Style A · Chemical record built into the job

Service Autopilot is a long-running CRM for lawn, landscape and pest businesses, and its pitch centers on automating recurring programs. Its plan comparison names Chemical Tracking as a feature. Entry pricing was $49 a month on annual billing for the Startup plan when we checked on October 7, 2026, with higher tiers above it.

Two things were unclear from public pages. The plan comparison doesn’t make plain which tier includes Chemical Tracking, and the pricing page mentions a sign-up fee, so the first month costs more than the $49 sticker price. For a lawn or landscape company with years of recurring programs those are demo questions, not dealbreakers. For a contractor who wants to start this week on published, all-in pricing, they add friction.

Against QuoteIQ: Both name Chemical Tracking as a plan feature. QuoteIQ publishes the tier and price and layers rule-based safeguards on top, while Service Autopilot has more years behind recurring-program automation. Ask both to run the same scenario in a demo: log a product, add wind and temperature, then export the record.

Best for: Lawn, landscape and pest companies whose revenue comes from recurring programs.

Pros

  • Chemical Tracking is a named feature in its plan comparison
  • Built around recurring lawn, landscape and pest programs
  • Automating recurring billing and scheduling is central to its pitch
  • Entry price is low for a mature platform

Cons

  • It isn’t clear from public pages which plan includes Chemical Tracking
  • A sign-up fee is mentioned, so the real first-month cost is higher
  • The $49 entry price is on annual billing
  • Aimed at recurring programs more than one-off project quoting

Ask in the demo: Which plan unlocks Chemical Tracking? What is the sign-up fee, and are there add-on modules? What can I export for an inspector?

Verdict: A mature recurring-program CRM with chemical tracking on its feature list. Get the plan and fee answers in writing before you compare it with QuoteIQ Pro.

7

Real Green — Best for Established Lawn Care Companies Buying Through Sales

Custom — contact salesStyle B · Lawn specialist platform

Real Green Systems, whose main product is called Service Assistant, has sold lawn care software for years, and its pitch centers on lawn application programs, route scheduling and customer billing. Pricing is quote-based and modular. Third-party sources cite an implementation fee near $995, which we could not confirm.

We could not verify a field-by-field list of its chemical record from public pages, so treat the style label as provisional and ask for the field list in the demo. Bring a checklist: EPA number, rate and area, wind and temperature, an applicator license snapshot, the re-entry interval and an export your state will accept.

Against QuoteIQ: The comparison is limited by how little Real Green publishes. QuoteIQ shows its chemical record fields and prices in public, and Real Green asks you to start a sales conversation. Give both vendors the same test: log a product with an EPA number, add weather, close the job and export.

Best for: Established lawn care companies that want a lawn-specific platform and are comfortable with a sales-led purchase.

Pros

  • Designed for lawn care rather than adapted to it
  • Long history in the lawn category
  • Modular quoting lets you buy only what you need

Cons

  • Quote-only, modular pricing
  • An implementation fee is cited by third parties
  • Public pages say little about the chemical record at field level
  • Not designed for project-style estimating

Ask in the demo: Please send the exact fields in the application record and a sample state export. What does implementation cost, and which modules do I need for chemical tracking?

Verdict: A lawn specialist worth a demo if you run structured lawn programs. With little public detail, the burden of proof is on the vendor.

8

Jobber — Best Generalist CRM If You Build Your Own Chemical Form

Core $29/mo billed annually · $49 month-to-monthStyle C · Build-your-own form

Jobber is the polished general-purpose field service CRM, with a clean interface, strong customer communication tools and one of the larger integration lists on this page. For chemical tracking, Jobber offers a customizable chemical tracking form, which we checked on October 7, 2026. That is a form you design, as opposed to a purpose-built log with an EPA product catalog, automatic totals and weather rules.

Which plan includes the form was not clear from what we read, and we would confirm that crews can complete it in the mobile app mid-job. A form can be enough for a contractor who needs a consistent note of what was applied, but it puts the discipline on you. Ask whether the form can be required before a job closes, because purpose-built logs enforce that by design.

Against QuoteIQ: Jobber Core is cheaper at the sticker level ($29 a month billed annually, against $199.99 for QuoteIQ Pro), but a form does not enforce a record or calculate totals. QuoteIQ’s purpose-built log does both, and the price gap is the cost of that structure.

Best for: Contractors who already run Jobber, or want a polished generalist, and apply chemicals only part of the time.

Pros

  • Polished, easy-to-learn interface
  • Strong client communication tools
  • Large integration list
  • Customizable chemical tracking form

Cons

  • A form you design, not a purpose-built chemical log
  • No EPA product catalog, automatic totals or weather rules that we found
  • Plan inclusion and mobile completion were not clear
  • Entry price is on annual billing

Ask in the demo: Which plan includes the chemical form? Can crews complete it on the phone? Can it be required before a job closes, and can I report across all jobs by product?

Verdict: Great software for running a service business, adequate for light chemical documentation, and not the pick when chemicals are central to your revenue.

Compare QuoteIQ vs Jobber

9

Housecall Pro — Context Pick: Strong Booking, No Dedicated Chemical Log

Basic $59/mo billed annually · $79 month-to-monthStyle C · Checklists and photos

Housecall Pro is a context pick. Many contractors already run it, and it is worth knowing where it stands. Its strengths are customer-facing booking, reminders and a polished mobile app. We could not find a dedicated pesticide or chemical log. What it offers is custom checklists and photo reports, which we checked on October 7, 2026, and a crew can use those to note products and photograph treated areas.

That is documentation, but it isn’t a chemical record. Free-text checklist answers don’t carry an EPA number catalog, calculated totals or a license snapshot, and they are harder to filter across a season. If an inspector or an unhappy customer asks what went on a lawn in May, a structured log answers in seconds and a stack of checklists does not.

Against QuoteIQ: Housecall Pro is cheaper than QuoteIQ Pro at the entry level and strong on booking, but checklists are not a chemical record. QuoteIQ’s catalog, totals, weather capture and required entry are the difference when someone later asks what was applied.

Best for: Residential contractors who apply chemicals only occasionally and mainly need photos and notes.

Pros

  • Polished customer booking and reminders
  • Custom checklists and photo reports
  • Photos document the property before and after

Cons

  • No dedicated chemical log that we could find
  • Checklist answers are free text, with no EPA catalog or calculated totals
  • Harder to filter and export by product or applicator
  • Entry price is on annual billing

Ask in the demo: Can a checklist be required before a job closes? Can I export checklist answers across all of a customer’s jobs, or for a single product?

Verdict: A strong booking tool that gets you partway there. If chemical records are a compliance requirement for you, a purpose-built log is safer.

Compare QuoteIQ vs Housecall Pro

10

Workiz — Context Pick: Custom Fields and a Built-In Phone Line

Custom — contact salesStyle C · Custom fields and checklists

Workiz pairs a field service CRM with a built-in business phone line, which suits teams that live on inbound calls. Pricing was quote-only when we checked on October 7, 2026. For chemical tracking, Workiz offers custom fields, checklists and service plans, which you can combine to capture product names and notes on each job. We found no dedicated chemical log.

Custom fields are flexible, and a careful operator can build a reasonable record out of them. The cost is setup time and ongoing discipline, and the record won’t calculate totals or warn about weather. Workiz earns its place as a general-purpose option for small teams that mostly need call handling and scheduling and only occasionally need a chemical record.

Against QuoteIQ: Workiz is flexible and QuoteIQ is structured. A well-built set of Workiz custom fields can cover the basics, but QuoteIQ gives you the catalog, calculated totals, weather capture and required entry without any setup work.

Best for: Phone-heavy small teams that need occasional chemical notes rather than a full compliance record.

Pros

  • Built-in phone system and call handling
  • Custom fields and checklists you can shape
  • Service plans for recurring work

Cons

  • No dedicated chemical log that we could find
  • Pricing isn’t published
  • Record quality depends on how well you set up the fields
  • No calculated totals or weather rules that we found

Ask in the demo: Which custom fields can be made mandatory? Can I report on a field such as “product” across all jobs? What does the plan cost for my team size?

Verdict: A flexible generalist. If your chemical records have to survive an audit, choose a tool that is built for them.

Compare QuoteIQ vs Workiz

Six Chemical Tracking Mistakes a CRM Should Prevent

Most record problems come from habits, not from bad intentions. A good CRM makes the right habit the easy one. These are the six mistakes we see most, and what to look for so the software prevents them:

  1. Logging from memory at the end of the day. A record written tonight about four stops is a reconstruction. Look for entry on the job itself, a system-generated time stamp and offline entry, so crews can log on site even with no signal.
  2. Typing EPA numbers by hand. A transposed digit makes the record wrong and hard to catch. Look for a product catalog that supplies the number when you pick the product.
  3. Letting licenses drift. If a record shows today’s license instead of the license held on the day of the visit, a renewal can quietly rewrite history. Look for a license snapshot frozen on save.
  4. Skipping visits where nothing was applied. If every chemical visit has a record and some other visits do not, a gap looks like a missing treatment. Look for a rule that asks for an application or a “none applied” entry before a job can close.
  5. Ignoring the weather fields. Product labels set wind and temperature limits for a reason. Look for a tool that records both and puts a second set of eyes on a reading over the label maximum.
  6. Forgetting the customer. Re-entry intervals and the products applied belong on the paperwork the customer receives, not only in your files. Look for chemical details that carry through to the invoice and the PDF without retyping.

What It Costs to Turn Chemical Tracking On

Sticker prices hide the real question, which is the cheapest plan that actually includes the chemical record. Here is what we found, using prices checked October 7–8, 2026:

The cheapest sticker price isn’t always the cheapest tool. A $49 plan that leaves you keeping a spreadsheet on the side costs you every hour spent copying data, and the first time a customer disputes a treatment, a clean log is worth more than the monthly difference. The reverse is also true: a big platform you use at 20% capacity is not a bargain. Match the tool to the records you actually have to produce.

Chemical Records by the Numbers (2026)

Chemical records are a small-business problem. Most contractors who apply products run small crews, and the rules they follow come from federal law and from their state. A few figures put that in context.

108,700Pest control worker jobs in the U.S. (BLS)
6%Projected employment growth for pest control workers (BLS)
2 yearsFederal minimum for keeping restricted-use pesticide application records (7 U.S.C. 136i-1)
5 yearsHow long Minnesota requires application records to be kept (Minn. Stat. 18B.37)
5 daysMinnesota’s deadline to complete an application record (Minn. Stat. 18B.37)
36.2MU.S. small businesses, which employ 45.9% of private-sector workers (SBA Office of Advocacy)

BLS reports pest control workers as their own occupation. Lawn, landscape and tree crews that apply products appear under other categories, so the number of people who apply chemicals for a living is larger than the first figure suggests. Minnesota is one example of how a state can go beyond the federal minimum, and your state may differ.

Which CRM with Chemical Tracking Should You Pick? 7 Situations, 7 Picks

If you run a solo lawn care route and watch every dollar

Start with GorillaDesk Basic ($49/mo) or Spraye ($79.99/mo) if spray routes are all you do, and confirm the chemical features in the plan you buy. If you also quote one-off jobs such as aeration, mulch or clean-ups, QuoteIQ Pro puts the estimate, the chemical record and the invoice in one place for $199.99 a month.

If you run a 3–5 person pest control company

Decide first whether your state requires formatted reports. If it does, shortlist PestPac and FieldRoutes and ask to see the exact report. If a PDF or CSV log is enough for your inspector, QuoteIQ Pro (4 users included) or GorillaDesk Pro ($99/mo) are the lower-cost routes.

If you’re a landscaper adding fertilization and weed control

You now have a regulated service line next to a quoting business. QuoteIQ is built for that mix: MapMeasure Pro for measurements, estimates and invoices for the work, and a chemical record on the same job. Service Autopilot is the alternative if recurring programs are your whole model.

If you run pressure washing or soft washing crews

Record requirements vary by state and by product, so check yours first, then pick for the workflow. QuoteIQ’s calculators, including the Downstream Injector Calculator, and its Chemical Tracking sit beside your quotes and photos. Jobber and Housecall Pro can carry notes and photos if your records are informal.

If you apply restricted-use products

Choose a tool that captures the applicator’s license and makes the record hard to skip. QuoteIQ freezes license details onto the record and asks for a restricted-use acknowledgment, and PestPac and FieldRoutes add state-formatted reports. Don’t rely on free-text checklists for this.

If you operate in several states or run 20+ technicians

Look at PestPac or FieldRoutes first. Their reporting and route depth are built for scale, and a sales-led purchase comes with the territory. QuoteIQ Max (20 users included, $699.99/mo) is worth a demo if you want one app for the whole business, but check your state reporting needs before you decide.

If you only need proof for the occasional treatment

Don’t overbuy. A Jobber or Housecall Pro checklist with photos may be enough, and if you’re already on one of them it costs nothing extra. Move to a purpose-built log the day chemicals become a regular revenue line, or the day a regulator or customer asks for more.

How We Picked the Top 10, Step by Step

  1. Started with the platforms contractors who apply chemicals actually use. We built the universe from pest, lawn and landscape specialists, the all-in-one contractor CRMs that market chemical features, and the general field service leaders many crews already own. Ten made the list. FieldEdge and ServiceTitan’s own platform were not reviewed for a chemical log and are not ranked.

  2. Checked each vendor’s own pages for a chemical log. For every platform we read its product, help and pricing pages on October 7–8, 2026, looking for the eight items in a defensible application record and for state-formatted reports. QuoteIQ was reviewed against its own feature page and product documentation.

  3. Recorded published pricing and left the rest blank. We used the price on the vendor’s page and labeled annual billing where it applied. Where no price was published we wrote “Custom — contact sales” and did not guess. Conflicts between pages, like GorillaDesk’s add-on question, are shown in the entry.

  4. Scored five criteria and ranked. Record depth, reporting and exports, workflow fit, pricing transparency and honest limitations decided the order. Style B specialists rank on reporting depth, and Style C generalists rank last because their chemical record is a form you build.

  5. Wrote the limits for every tool, ours included. Each entry has real cons and a demo question. We did not test competitors hands-on and did not aggregate competitor review scores, and the page says so. Perspective from Mike Vidan and Justin Rogers shaped the criteria, not the verdicts.

What Contractors Say About QuoteIQ

★★★★★

“Chemical mix calculator is super useful”

— Zertron Vang · App Store

★★★★★

“Its very accessible to new comers and allows them to learn the ropes of property pricing and chemical mixing easily.”

— Disco Dave · Google Play

★★★★★

“This saved us from litigation that might have otherwise been the source of our business closure.”

— Drew Fenwick · Google

A note on these reviews: they are real, verbatim 5-star reviews from the App Store, Google Play and Google, but none is about Chemical Tracking, which launched in September 2026 after they were written. Two mention chemical mixing tools or pricing a property, and Drew’s is about saved photos from client walkarounds, which is the same instinct behind a good chemical record.

Built by Operators Who’ve Run Service Businesses

Mike Vidan, Co-Founder

Mike co-founded QuoteIQ with Justin Rogers. A home service business owner and YouTuber (580K+ subscribers), he built his audience sharing advice on quoting, pricing and growing a pressure washing or home service business, and QuoteIQ’s features began with the problems contractors raised in his comments.

Read Mike’s insights →

Justin Rogers, Co-Founder

Justin co-founded QuoteIQ alongside Mike. A home service business owner and YouTuber behind the Forever Self Employed channel (743K+ subscribers), he has spent years teaching contractors how to build a business that lasts, and he brings that operator lens to how QuoteIQ is built.

Read Justin’s insights →

Frequently Asked Questions

QuoteIQ is the best fit for most contractors who quote, schedule, invoice and apply chemicals, because the application record lives inside the same job as the estimate and invoice. PestPac and FieldRoutes lead on state-formatted reporting for large pest control firms, and Spraye is a strong spray-route specialist. Your best pick depends on your trade, your state’s reporting rules and your crew size.

A good chemical record captures the product and its EPA registration number, the rate, area treated and total used, the property and site, a date and time stamp, the applicator’s name and license, the wind and temperature, and the re-entry interval. The strongest tools also record visits where nothing was applied, so a gap in the log means something.

It depends on the product and your state. Federal law requires certified applicators who use restricted-use pesticides to keep application records for two years, and many states require records for general-use products too, with their own fields, deadlines and retention periods. This is general information, not legal advice, so check your state lead agency for the rules attached to your license.

Federal law sets a two-year minimum for restricted-use pesticide records, and some states ask for longer. Minnesota, for example, requires five years and expects the record to be completed within five days of the application. Keep records at least as long as your state requires, and consider keeping them longer, since a customer dispute can surface well after a visit.

QuoteIQ suits lawn companies that also quote and invoice one-off work. Spraye and Real Green fit structured spray programs, and Service Autopilot or GorillaDesk fit companies whose revenue comes from recurring routes. Whichever you consider, ask the vendor to show the exact fields in the application record and a sample export before you sign.

PestPac and FieldRoutes have the deepest state reporting, which matters most for larger pest control companies. GorillaDesk is a budget-friendly option for small crews, and QuoteIQ suits companies that want the chemical record in the same app as quotes, scheduling and invoices. If your state requires a specific report format, confirm the vendor can produce it before you buy.

Yes. QuoteIQ Chemical Tracking launched in September 2026. Businesses turn it on in Settings or by enabling Track Chemicals on a service, and it stays hidden for businesses that do not use chemicals. Each application is logged against the job and carries through to the invoice and PDF, with a Treatment History on the customer’s contact record.

As of this update, QuoteIQ’s Chemical Tracking feature page lists it on Pro and above. Pro is $199.99 a month with 4 users, or $1,999.99 a year. Plan details can change, so confirm the tier on a demo or inside the app before you commit. Every plan includes a 14-day free trial.

Entry prices on this list run from about $29 to $49 a month for Jobber and GorillaDesk, though Jobber’s chemical record is a form you build. Spraye starts at $79.99, QuoteIQ Pro (which includes Chemical Tracking per its feature page) is $199.99, and Spraye Premium is about $400. PestPac, FieldRoutes, Real Green and Workiz quote on request. Prices were checked October 7–8, 2026.

In QuoteIQ, yes. Entries made without a connection are held in a durable queue on the phone and sent when service returns, so a basement or rural lot does not leave a gap in the record. For other platforms, ask whether the mobile app supports offline entry for the chemical form specifically, since some features work only on the web.

When a wind reading is entered above the product label’s maximum, QuoteIQ stops the save, and a temperature outside the label range raises a warning. Restricted-use products also ask the applicator to acknowledge that status before saving. The tool backs up the applicator’s judgment, but it does not replace reading the label or following your state’s rules.

QuoteIQ exports the applications log as a PDF or a 40-column CSV, filtered by product, applicator, customer or date. It does not produce agency-formatted state reports. PestPac and FieldRoutes advertise state-specific reporting, including California and Arizona formats in PestPac’s case. Ask your state agency what format it accepts, then test that export during your trial.

We did not find a full-featured free CRM with a purpose-built chemical log. Most vendors on this list offer demos, and QuoteIQ offers a 14-day free trial on every plan. Checklist-based approaches in general-purpose tools can cost little, but they lack the catalog, totals and enforcement that make a record dependable.

Requirements vary by state and by product, and many cleaning chemicals are not pesticides. Even so, a record of what you mixed, where you applied it and what you rinsed is useful for customer disputes, runoff questions and training new crew. QuoteIQ includes a Downstream Injector Calculator on every plan and Chemical Tracking on Pro and above, per its feature page.

A spreadsheet records what someone remembers to type. A purpose-built log attaches the record to the job, pulls EPA numbers from a catalog, calculates totals, captures weather and a system time stamp, freezes the applicator’s license, and can stop a job from closing without a record. It also puts the same data on the invoice and in the customer’s history without retyping.

Yes. QuoteIQ supports mass import of contacts on every plan, so you can bring customer lists in from a spreadsheet or an export from another CRM. Past treatment history in an old system or a binder usually has to be kept as an archive in its original form. Run both for a short overlap, then cut over.

Trusted by thousands of verified contractors · 4.7★ average rating · 4,103+ reviews on App Store + Google Play

Related Reading

The Bottom Line

For most contractors who apply chemicals and also sell, schedule and invoice work, QuoteIQ is the best CRM with chemical tracking in 2026. The record sits on the same job as the estimate and the invoice, the rules that matter (a record for every visit, a wind-over-label block, a frozen license snapshot) are built in rather than left to memory, and the price is published. Per its feature page, Chemical Tracking starts on Pro at $199.99 a month, and every plan has a 14-day free trial.

The runners-up earn their spots. PestPac and FieldRoutes are the tools to demo if you are a larger pest control company that files state-formatted reports. Spraye and GorillaDesk are honest, focused options for spray routes and small budgets. Service Autopilot and Real Green are mature lawn and landscape platforms worth a conversation. Jobber, Housecall Pro and Workiz are good businesses tools that can carry a chemical form or checklist, and they are the right call only while chemicals are a side note in your business.

Whatever you choose, test the part that matters. Log a fake application, try to close the job without one, pull the log and export it, then ask what your state’s inspector would want to see. A record you can produce in a minute is worth far more than one you meant to keep.

Keep the Record Where the Work Happens

14-day free trial on every plan. Plans start at $29.99/mo, and Chemical Tracking is on Pro and above per its feature page.

Start Free TrialSchedule a Demo

Sources Cited

  1. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Pest Control Workers — Occupational Outlook Handbook. bls.gov.
  2. Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. 7 U.S.C. 136i-1: Use of restricted use pesticides; applicators. law.cornell.edu.
  3. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. Pesticide Record Keeping. ams.usda.gov.
  4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Federal Certification Standards for Pesticide Applicators. epa.gov.
  5. Office of the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. Minn. Stat. 18B.37: Pesticide application records. revisor.mn.gov.
  6. U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy. Frequently Asked Questions About Small Business 2026. advocacy.sba.gov.
  7. ServiceTitan. ServiceTitan Accelerates Expansion Into Pest Control and Lawn Care with Acquisition of FieldRoutes. servicetitan.com.
  8. PestPac. Pest Control Chemical Tracking. Vendor page checked October 2026. pestpac.com.
  9. FieldRoutes. Pest control pesticide usage tracking apps. Vendor page checked October 2026. fieldroutes.com.
  10. Spraye. Automated Chemical Tracking and compliance reporting, and pricing. Vendor pages checked October 7, 2026. spraye.io.
  11. GorillaDesk. Material Usage add-on and Plans & pricing. Vendor pages checked October 7, 2026. gorilladesk.com.
  12. Service Autopilot, Real Green, Jobber, Housecall Pro and Workiz vendor sites, checked October 7–8, 2026. serviceautopilot.com.
  13. QuoteIQ. Chemical Tracking feature page, Pricing and product documentation, October 2026. myquoteiq.com/features/chemical-tracking-software.